Search results

i know what you guys mean about the easy stuff being harder, because its the easy stuff where you've gotta be carefull of every word you say and how it shows the answer perfectly. i'd much rather write 2 pages on electron degenerecy pressure in neutron stars than 2 lines on colour index...

what did you guys put for this one? i thought it was a rather stupid q. with transport, were they refering to the transportation of electricity through lines and the energy benifits here, or were they talking about transport as in maglev trains etc. they could have worded it better......

i definetly agree with spice girl. unfortunatly i'm also beginning to agree with Lazarus...

what you guys think? i thought it was way too fucken easy. just like the rest... 2 marks for colour index, they must be expecting us to fail with something that easy worth 2 marks.. nothing on absorbtion or emmission spectra... nothing on STELLER LIFECYCLES fume. they asked us crap. what...

bullseye 15. test way too fucken easy:mad:

don't you mean the classic theory of blackbody emissions or something?

wow, i'm surprised only one person wants me to stop starting stupid threads.........does this mean you want more...? i'm with blackjack..we'll see tommorrow.......

the sheet would slow briefly, (curve) then continue through the field at a constant speed (linear) then accelerate again (curve)

general relativity might have some answers. its for noninertial frames of reference. remember that general relativity is the revised edition, thus special relativity has its problems. there is no absolute time. "at rest" is a bad pronunciation thats come over time, t0 actually refers to absolute...

any final questions before the big one? "i've been waiting for you O big one. We meet again. this times the last....."

a poll for the sake of a poll.... why i'm on the net now...

next time you get a speeding ticket tell the cops you were trying to look thinner and stay younger!!!

remember the formula I=neva where I=current n=no of electrons e=charge of electrons v=drift velocity a=cross sectional area. you can work it all out from this.. if you decrease the cross sectional area the velocity increases (squeeze your willy next time you take a piddle and see):D :D...

its relativity ppl...you wouldn't feel any heavier because you're in the same frame or reference. it would just be everyone else telling you your fat!!!!(provided they can see you travelling at c):D

i'm sderiously sooo screwed for chem ,it's gonna drag my uai down so far....i should never have chosen it, but it was either that or french (arrogant bastards all)

MY GOD, I'VE JUST FOUND A NEW DOT POINT. WE HAVE TO BE ABLE TO CALCULATE MASS CHANGES AT C AND WE'RE NOT GIVEN THE FORMULA ON THE FORMULA SHEET!MY TEXTBOOK HASN'T GOT IT!ANYONE KNOW IT HELPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP!!!!!!!!!!! not really, i just thought i...

but if light is proved to have mass then an infinite mass wouldn'd occur at c, thus it still could be possible to travell at this speed.....

ahh your youthfull curiosity has served you well.... you might want to revise your enie meni minei mo theory, or you'll just get d for every answer!!!!!

good luck to everyone who sits phys tomorrow...... (unless you beat me) and may the force be with you ....(wish me the same for chem, i'll need it.): :D :D

dc current can't be transformed from various voltage to current ratios because the current doesn't oscilate, which is the principal of induction that transformers are based on. thus everyone would have one set ratio for everything and energy loss wouild be enourmous! ac is also cheaper to produce