Search results

And we are assuming the pill is entirely healthy with no side effects yes?

Ben Saul, of the UNSW Law Faculty, goes through the new laws: • Briefing on proposed Australian counter-terrorism laws

You're not going to flog me with eighty stripes? :p

What? 2-3 forms of contraception simultaneously? Like what?

:rolleyes:

True. But it's so satisfying quashing his puny arguments :p

I didn't set out to prove the conclusion was wrong, I set out to prove that your argument is flawed. Which I did. No, my argument is based on logic, which I carefuly explained. Incorrect. I did not appeal to the course in support of my argument. I used reason and logic to prove my argument. If...

John, I never said you had breached the rules. I draw your attention to the rules because you would have breached them by now had they been in existence in the history forum. On a side note, I would mention that it is not a defence to breaching the rules that you did so because of religious...

hahaha magnificent

I'm not sure one can claim not to be an Austen fan without have first read P&P :p

No-one here is going to take you seriously with ridiculous unfounded views like that. I note that you have found your way to the News, Current Affairs & Politics section. While I am not directly responsible for what you have been doing in the history section, I warn you now of the Forum Rules.

My friend, with the greatest respect I think that you would benefit from taking a first-year philosophy course in reason and logic in order to improve your argumentative skills. 95% of what you just wrote constitutes an extended ad hominem argument - perhaps one of the worst fallacies one can...

I am not attacking the LPAB here, just defending my uni. The detail and number of cases As has been mentioned, and I speak only for UNSW here, in subjects such as Contracts and Property, we study cases in number and depth to the fullest extent possible. I would estimate we read at least...

A whole degree of truth? I wouldn't go that far. I think the accuracy of that article can only be posited in terms of an infinitesimal fraction practically holding hands with zero :p

The company waived their contractual right to terminate..

May be of interest

It's nice to see enthusiasm but generally high-schoolers are trying to focus on their HSC :P (By-the-by you probably just alienated a considerable number of people by saying that just because "a liberal government is in power" things must be bad)

There are good (and obvious) reasons for separating religion and state, regardless of anyone's context or religion. 1. Not all people believe the religion. 2. Religions promote faith, not reason. They are dangerous institutions to found anything on because one cannot question ideas as...

lol that was random bon voyage!

He killed millions of Jews without cause. That is morally wrong under any credible normative ethical theory. And to say "Nietzsche would have been proud" or St Augustine said "violence transcends ethics when required to defend ones faith" does not support your argument (fallacy of appealling...