Search results

I had 24 free periods per fornight (thats with 6 periods per day on a 2 week cycle), did 11 units. I had a couple of days off and only had 1 full day per 2 weeks. Other than that usually either arrive after morning break or leave at tea. But I was at School every monday arvo till 5. Needless to...

hehe yeah very convinient ay!

yeah im really hoping there aren't two specific questions cos I'll be screwed

I would use google to check up on iy. Im pretty sure there are still some instances of mandatory sentencing in both NT & WA, but Im certainly not 100% so Id check up on it.

well its not technically a surrogate mother, all they had was an agreement which was not legally binding, and in the eyes of the law, this woman was the baby's one and only mother

I agree, we've pretty much finished school, who gives a shit anymore. Legal is on Friday (which sucks arse cos we all have at least 3 exams nect week if not more!) so everyone should be studying up for that

biological mother is the mother whose egg it was surrogate mother is the one who carried it. In most surrogacy cases the real mother's egg is implanted into the surrogate mother's womb, thus making the surrrogate and biological mothers different things

Its actually an informal defence. It has been accepted in a couple of noteworthy cases, a woman has either maliciously wounded or killed her husband has has used the fact that she was a victim of domestic violence as a defence.

Institutionalized inequality actually refers to the inequality 'naturally' faced by certain individuals/groups. For examples, the Aboriginal persons suffer institutionalized inequality under the law because of their lack of access (see the notion of access) as well as within things like...

Yeah I thought it was the surrogate mum that got the kid

Once again, grow up.

theres two questions, so maybe one will be Weimar, one women & youth? But we did women & youth for our trial (I didn't answer it though) so what are the chances?

you'll mainly need to concentrate on WHY the court ruled the marriage was valid and that it was a precedent

Yeah Im afraid I don't know of anyone doing that topic. I think it would be interesting though.

I have it but I don't have the time to type it up, if you wanna PM me your address I can photocopy it and send it to you.

yeah ask your legal teacher to print out a few for you

That was soooo lame. You actually did insult her appearance You won't be recieving fan mail And you didn't shut anyone down You cheapened the argument by bringing in personal insults and things that were totally irrelevant. The question at hand here is whether you get a better...

if you look at it, the first one is general, the second one isn't/\.

if you want to look at it like that, then yes it is incredibly against the odds that they will make both questions that similar

yep thats what Im saying