Search results

Please explain. How? Why? *lost*

Uhhh...difficult paper! Circle Geometry was a BITCH. CONICS WAS A BIGGER BITCH. Did anyone else think it was toooo long? I mean - compared to 2004, 2003 it was way longer and way harder. Or maybe its just me. Glad its over.

For the second part, do you assume friction to have a direction and then try and find magnitude? Or it is something to do with the fact that for small angles tanA = SinA?

The first part is bookwork - no friction Draw the diagram Where A is the banked angle NsinA = mv^2/r NcosA=mg N=mg/cosA mg/cosA=mv^2/rsinA v^2 = 2gtanA v = sqrt rgtranA

thanks underthebridge!! i was having problems with the initial resolving of forces - you cleared it up! merci! :D

Ah! Bio is the next day after Maths! I hate this. I'm a little bit unsure about Search for Better Health - esp the last few parts... *sigh* *fingers crossed*

Use the damn compass :) Its more exact too - which is a good thing incase your diagram effects your interpretation of the question - as in the CSSA 2005 trials... when they asked for the area ....the circle only touched the axis..or something...

Here it is: http://photobucket.com/albums/b363/vasu_vasu/?action=view&current=circlegeometry.jpg

I made one - which miraculously was correct according to the solutions... let me scan + attach... Its too large.......

Algebraic stuff. Hate geometry.

A topic I simple detest. Why can't we breeze through with only resisted motion? *sigh* Anyhow - question: A particle hangs by a light inextensible string of length a from a fixed point O, and a second particle of the same mass hangs from the first by an equal string. The whole system moves...

Its never too late! Bring on 1993. Of course I am screwed for 4U (Not the same kind of screwed as Dumsum up there ^ who reckons 93/120 is bad - a worse kind of screwed) This is going to be the worst or best three hours ever. KFunk, you'll do good :) Back to Mechanics.

Spam in the MX2 forum? How could you?

Exactly! It was just like an argument. Only a bit of persuasive language...

Damn Extension. Is it too late to drop? This euphoric "No English!" mood is taking over me... :D

Ah - unlike the two before me, i think that the paper was - fair. It wasn't easy - though they didn't fool us with text types, the questions were different - not very direct. A good paper, (except maybe the THREE poems in Module B), but definately not the easiest since the new HSC - that...

I was so pissed!!! However, I spoke to my English Teacher after, and she said, by 'refer to three poems' it did not mean close analysis of all three - for which there was no time. Just inculcating a third poem - by using sylistic features, recurring themes etc would have been fine. Which...

Two or Three is the general way. Two is all I can fit -with 2 readings + shit about context and style. I'm freaking praying that they don't specify. If they do, I'm screwed.

My 18th is on my last exam :D

We got the exemplar responses at our school as well, and some of them - especially module B - are really misleading. They're not always on the top end of the band - more likely to be a 17/20 rather than 19/20 - so you should keep that in account. This is so because the markers pull out...