stupid maybe...
but science and religion are far from opposites, that's merely your opinion.
and not all of science is "proven to be true"
how many times has the model of an atom changed in the past 100 years?? science is not completely about fact but about theory and proving theories...
hmm interesting quote.
but if you want to argue bible with me i'll do my best.
yeah the bible sure does say that, but you know what, Jesus came to earth. YAY!
see the old testament was the book of law. it was about all the things we must do in order to be fit infront of God.
the new...
if you want complete honesty, i haven't read, or know enough about the Koran or the Torah to tell you if it is or isn't different.
there is a stack of evience to support the Bible and it's writings, especially the new testament.
is there that for the Koran or Torah? [o and that's not a challenge...
i can't say that i can, as i gave the book back. but i do recall him saying that how can anyone trust the bible because it's weird.
just quietly there is a whole lot of evidence as to the reliability of the bible.
and good for richard dawkins for thinking the bible is weird. but that's not an...
i'm quite aware of who wrote the bible... there are many many different authors ranging from moses to paul.
and yes it does require one to believe the bible in order for that arguement to be true. but as i said it was from a certain book and in the book it had already explored the reliability...
you have an afterlife... well thinking about it maybe this is just rewording what you said not to say but seriously,
because that's the way God made things to be.
as for consenting...well, that's like complaining about the family your born into.
nobody gets to choose, it's just the way things...
well there is, one has studied the bible and the other harry potter.
:P
but really, shouldn't you treat anyone with a phD as an academic, regardless of what subject they did?
cause if you didn't call someone academic cause it was for theology, sorta alittle discriminatory.
just a thought.
ok so most of my information is taken from bill medley's "religion is for fools"
but here goes,
Medley quotes Dr. D James Kennedy saying " It cannot be said that these prohecies were written afterthe events for many of the events took place hundreds or even thousands of years after the prophecy...
personally i'm a christian. so i believe in God and i've read heaps of arguments for why God does exist from various christian authors, and they are quite interesting, and i tried to read one from richard dawkins... but i couldn't finish it, give me an intellectual argument against christianity...