Search results

and the first part about what that comment meant avoided and to best i can recall and can find quickly, America wasn't even involved in 1948. In the Suez War in 1956, France and the UK were supporting Israel, and the U.S. pushed for a resolution, involving France and the UK giving up the...

so, you give an example of discrimination by making up the examples. well, i'm impressed.

second, if you've ever watched star wars, you'd be aware that the Jedi philosophy evolved as neccessary. of course, in the prequels, some of the Jedi HAD families, and later on, many do. as far as basic tenets of Jedi philosophy, nothing wrong with sex or love.

ok, explain how that makes ANY sense. this is also the first time i've ever heard someone say that Israel is at the beck and call of America. Normally its how the evil Jews run america.

give a link to the two articles, if possible and while its something perhaps to look into, i think you're making very large generalisations with little to back it up

i think i'd agree, more i think about it

yeah, but by that logic, Jedi religion tops that. Both religions created by science fiction writers.

yeah, but Mormonism is only couple hundred years old and added mroe stuff to bible, so it tops it

more importantly, if islam is right cuz it revised, doesn't this basicly mean that the most recent religion is always right?

wondering if that guy even serves

referring to what? the cartoons in particular?

you mean like how plenty of people born outside of Australia are simply counted as Australian without mentioning their origins as well? I mean, if the chess champ has effectivly lived all his life in australia, does taht bug you as much as Russell Crowe, Mel Gibson, or Nicole Kidman being...

and my main point is racial characteristics are more relevant to a crime, esp if someone isn't caught, than otehr sorts of stories. also, since you argue the two girls weren't identified as australian, wouldn't the following, "The girls, of Liverpool and Canley Heights," rather identify them...

so we don't need to know the chess champion is arab, cuz we can work it out from the name though this enters some of the ethical questions taht get dealt with in journalism...another example being how its a journalistic standard to not give the names of rape victims, which has become...

ah, of course, how dare i refer to islamic posters when responding to your comment in which you quoted the following, all the while in a thread about the controversy caused by islamic protesters. foolish me being off topic nope, the islamic protesters weren't involved at all in the discussion...

this is also why you shouldn't have called the chess champion arab, as not all chess champions are arab. right? again, it would depend on the given article, but to say one article really is weak also, i would like to point out this case of discrimation against New Zealand: "THE New Zealand...

i was questioning your comment saying that people would be idiots if they were offended but NOT acting like the islamic protesters are

ooh...i didn't realise it was the same guy that was also a rapist. there is some element to the point, byt then there is also that its really only certain groups that consier themselves ethnically first and nationality second. the analogy i'd point out is that on an america-basis, the term...

so, if you don't threaten violence, but just ignore that which offends you, you're an idiot? firstly, keep in mind that in crimes, the description may be given if the person hasn't been caught because then desriptions do matter. you seem to be mixing nationality and race.

thats usually how it goes, really. news articles online don't change much because they just edit what they've got when theres new info