Search results

Re: Jihad Against Danish Newspaper If they were ONLY complaining to the paper and boycotting it, i wouldn't criticse at all. however, there are two issues that are why i'm so vocal 1. they feel the gov't should be responsible as well because they feel there should be censorship 2. they are...

Re: Jihad Against Danish Newspaper what do you mean, the people of denmark share such an opinion? and its NOT government's duty to ensure people aren't offened by printed material. You can print whatever you want. TV is different because there is some goveernment controls, as theres limited...

Re: Jihad Against Danish Newspaper Examples being, offhand Kevin Smith's Dogma was protested and Disney eventually had a different company distribute, and Monty Python's Life of Brian was not shown in some whole regions of England, I believe, for being.....either blasphamy or herecy. I forget...

Re: Jihad Against Danish Newspaper why is it muslims are more offended from a cartoon than they are from groups that use islam as a justifcation for murders? Where were the muslims out protesting bin laden, or demanding gov'ts stop sponsoring terrorism? That creates a more negative view os...

Re: Jihad Against Danish Newspaper well, that and about how they're using sms's to spread word of the boycott of european goods, on phones from europe

Re: Jihad Against Danish Newspaper And what did the pentagon do? the joint chiefs of staff wrote a letter saying they felt it was in bad taste and that it harmed the paper's credibility. It was NEVER said by any criticis I heard that the cartoonist should be arrested or jailed. A big part of...

strings or handcuffs that latter enhansing things far more than the former

not a good game, imo...but i liked the outcome

the arguement for "of course they are" being?

effectively never had a gf for valentine's day so not true

isn't that a bullfight at that point?

Re: Jihad Against Danish Newspaper The U.S. has said that basicly, freedom of speech is important, but it has to be considered if this is inciting stuff and you have to be careful with free speech. Its about the same thing as waht British gov't said. Frankly, I'm disappointed.

Re: Jihad Against Danish Newspaper and if you don't believe mohommad should be drawn...don't draw him or support a company that does. the issue is the attack of freedom involved. i'd add a question, why isn't the anger directed at people like bin laden who are the ones who are DIRECTLY...

I don't see the point of having pets, as you're taking animals, putting constraints on them, and they're often, often mistreated. So should no one be allowed to have pets of any fashion because some see no point in having pets?

generally speaking, though i've only been to one, i've not got an issue with it, in particular. i'm just not terribly familiar with it, so i'd not say i'm 100% behind it, just cuz its not something i know about. It does strike me though, off that first article, that their rationale against...

Re: Jihad Against Danish Newspaper yeah, problem being, i don't think the European countries should start making sacrifices here and give up on the concepts of free speech and marketplace of ideas and all. so i don't see how a resolution will come about at this point, because the demands beign...

Re: Jihad Against Danish Newspaper yeah, definitly. its very worrisome, since i don't see compromise coming, as its western views of freedom vs islamic views of....well.... "don't do something we don't like", basicly

info to go with it, perhaps? as to the arguement of why rodeos as a whole or in parts should be banned?

I think that can be seen to be really any religion if you look at the right portions of it. one of the issues with religions is that people that are strongly religious don't see as much of a need for compromise because a part of religion is beliving your religion is right, so its easier to...

Re: Jihad Against Danish Newspaper heck, i can see why some of them would be offensive based on content. but i don't care. thats the premise of free speech, that you can say anything, without it depending on how many people it offends.