Search results

It's "iterating" or "reiterating" dude. I don't normally do the grammar nazi thing unless it's illegible, but you've spelt it this way several times now.

Neither of you see the irony and hypocrisy involved in using freedom of speech to attack freedom of speech?

Because they're opinions and no one opinion is more valid than another, particularly amongst amateurs and students. Lolsmith is actually quite a smart guy, and yes, he is trolling you. Because you're so easy to troll and it's fun. But just because the medium is through trolling, it doesn't...

Hahahaha why? Everything he says is a valid contribution. So what if it's flavoured with a bit of swearing and insults? Again, that comes back to the concept of free speech. Just because you don't like what he says doesn't give you the right to silence him.

Seriously? They got asked by the Libyan rebels to intervene, and even then they took a back seat to France and Britain. Even now they are still not involved in Syria, despite Assad slaughtering his own citizens, because there is not clear and overwhelming calls by the rebels and their other...

One encompasses the other. Speech is as likely to be about love as it is about hate. Freedom of speech means you get both. Suck it up and don't be a pussy.

Except for all those military dictatorships where they only paid lip service to democracy. You know what North Korea's official name is? The Democratic People's Republic of Korea. Calling yourself a democracy doesn't mean shit.

Pride =/= strength.

Yes, and this is what I meant when I said you post useless shit. The mutually assured destruction doctrine has been around for nearly 70 years. We are all familiar with it. It is blatantly obvious. And a discussion of Pakistan attacking India is off-topic.

Because multi-megaton explosions hurt?

God you post useless shit. Besides the fact that this is a red herring, what possible reason would the US or China have to jump head first into a nuclear showdown?

Actually, they're not so stupid as to support someone just because they hate their major ally. It's more about an institutionalised fear of India than anything. Concern about India's influence in a Taliban-free Afghanistan leads to Pakistan supporting the Haqqani's and others in order to prevent...

Doet. You know you want to.

Please use grammar. This post is unreadable.

Wahhabis and Salafis are essentially the same. The doctrine is called Salafism ("ancestors" or something), but the guy who founded it was Abd Al-Wahab.

I think you need to get to know the rules of liberal democracy as well, not just krispy. It's about a multitude of voices, none of which has the right to silence any other through violent means. What's socially acceptable and what's allowed are two different concepts. It's not a dictatorship of...

I wasn't threatening them with violence or "punishment". I was just telling them to go fuck themselves. And you think a naughty little swear word invalidates the concept of liberal democracy? Au contraire.

If they can use a central dogma as justification for their actions, then it matters little whether the dogma is "peaceful" to the remaining 99%. If it's violent to the 1% then it is fair to label it as violent.

One aspect of it, yes. Much of the media denied it, but the perpetrators were quite happy to do it in the name of Christianity. But if you wish to discuss that incident then I would recommend making a new thread in the NCAP forum, because this thread is about the protests on the weekend.

I'm sorry, what? Because you're insulted? Go fuck yourself. You do not have the right to not be offended. Nor does anyone have the right to silence others through violence. Welcome to liberal democracy. I would recommend learning the rules, because they are not your own.