Search results

Christfags don't like it when you point this up. They tend to get flustered and change the subject: YouTube - CNNNN: Holy Homosexuals

END THE FED! b

Yes it is a truism, and truisms are true. That's why it should be obvious that what you are advocating is anti-freedom. You even admit it "does not entail complete freedom" as though its just a minor restriction. Having the government tell adults what to do with their working lives for several...

nah bro, i like to mix it up a bit. REP FOR EVERYONE!

Dude, he is trolling.

Yeah fighting is so noble. Men should be able to bash women, and men who are smaller or weaker than them because they happen to be born with a different body. This highlights why guns are so important. They are a great leveler.

You can't blame the wars on Islam. The USA chose to start a war for its own reasons. It has nothing to do with actually protecting anyone from terrorism. Especially the war in Iraq. Even the bush administration admitted Iraq had no links to Al-Qaeda.

So if its just to teach vocational skills, in what way is it an improvement on the current school, TAFE and university systems?

Ideally, how many times per day, on average, would you want to have sex. Me: 2

I am fully aware of this. The counterpoint I was making which you have missed is that often we make decisions based on imperfect information. We can not be certain if many things are true or not. But we can make a reasonable estimate based on available information. So in the case of the...

Fuck these technocrats. If drinking is so bad (which it is) and banning things solves problems, why not ban it for everyone. Or if it's because young people are "irresponsible" why not have government issued drinking licences to stop older people who don't know what's best for them from drinking?

Most amphetamines prescribed to people with ADD/ADHD are not in controlled release form. They are exactly the same as street speed only purer. You also seem to assume all recreational drug users are irresponsible maniacs. You have no evidence for this beyond media hype. From my experience...

Logic is useful. We can use it to make trucks, and hats and spoons. It's effectiveness is confirmed by empirical observations, which can be repeatedly tested and confirmed. Christianity serves no such purpose. This is just a dressed up circular argument; the bible is confirmed by the holy...

It uses some pretty weak examples. For instance: This is not analogous to the god problem. There is in fact evidence that there may be flies in the grand canyon even if we can't see them. The evidence being that we can observe flies in diverse locations all over the earth, so there is a good...

Ok lol, mr troll guy.

Yeah its easy to say that when you aren't one of the millions of people that has been murdered by this system you claim is the best available. When innocent people are consistently being killed I tend to think there might be room for improvement. How do you know it is the best available if you...

Prove its because of the current system, and not in spite of it. Even if our existence isn't shit (laregly because of technology) that doesn't mean it can't be massively improved.

If you don't read what they have to say, how do you know they are wrong? Also libertarianism is almost the exact opposite of communism and fascism. Well obviously past examples of the dominant ideology will be lauded. The example of democracy 2500 years ago also undermine your spiel about...

They had very low taxes and government intervention for at least the first hundred years. Police was about all the government provided, even the military was tiny. Even up until 1900 government spending was only around 5% of GDP compared to around 40% today. If more libertarian societies...

Awww man, these are the exact same things everyone says when they first hear about the idea of anarcho-capitalism. Read the responses to these same questions in one of the other ancap threads. Or better still go to mises.org I would urge you to have an honest think about it though. Put it...