Search results

Fyi, Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 at all. Its hardly going to scare the terrorists. It would be like me saying: "hey, I'm going to teach you a lesson Jonathan.....by bashing up this complete stranger. That'll teach ya." Killing civilians in Afghanistan is hardly effective either. The US...

It's quite ironic that the Prime Minister of Poland is calling for forcible castration of pedophiles, while at the same time saying that Roman Polanski (who pleaded guilty to sex with a 13 year old girl) should not be extradited to the US to face trial for his crime.

Another reason why children should be taught how to use guns responsibly as young as possible.

The government knows what is objectively right and wrong. Anyone who does not behave in the RIGHT way needs to be re-educated and forced to behave correctly. Thank you for sharing your wisdom with us, dear leader.

The poll is pretty stupid. I strongly support people's RIGHT to be homosexual. I don't much care if they actually choose to be.

Maybe we should do the same with Christians. Or anyone the so called majority don't like. Some people are so astoundingly ignorant.

This serius guy really gets enthusiastic about sticking up for pedos.

You have to trace it further back than that. How did the British Empire ever come into existence? Here's a hint: it wasn't by people coming together and voluntarily agreeing to by bound by a government and signing a social contract.

You must be thinking of the state run prisons which are packed full of non-violent offenders.

I see. So the prevailing attitudes of the time should be enshrined in law so that they continue to prevail in perpetuity? Do you have any idea what this would do to destroy human progress? Can you imagine the sort of horrific laws we would still have today if this view was adopted? I really...

As a New Zealander, I just though I'd let you all know that we don't want to merge with you either.

The government initially took the land by force, not by homesteading (look it up). Does this mean that if a superior power such as another government or a military coup overthrows the government by force, it becomes the new legitimate owner? Your argument seems to be nothing more than a ghastly...

Please quote the post that said the government was something "other than a representation of the citizens of the country." Sure it is a representation of the majority of citizens, but what gives the majority a right to impose their will on the minority?

The libertarian justification does get tiresome. But it is just as easy to justify the right to discriminate on practical grounds: Anti-Discrimination laws will only be passed in a society where the majority of people do not believe that discrimination on the basis of things like gender, race...