Search results

Not an opinion I'd voice in public.

I learnt that I shouldn't trade. that is, the market is almost efficent, technical analysis and fundamental analysis are a costly waste of time and I should be happy being a passive investor with an index fund. Oh how uni crushes dreams of abnormal profits...

The reverse holds true.

His biggest fan. :) Note my love for his remarkable witticisms and vocabularly.

Ok, so you posted a mistake in your first post. Good, we're making ground. Secondly, I agree'd way back (in our orginal argument) that it was not a moral question. The distinguishment I think lies on you to recognise it was one of science (although you wer'nt intially happy to do this)...

Otherwise, hating to repost, I'll suffer you to the condemnation I gave the user "theist" yesterday:

Then we come back to the topic. Concede, that on the evidence, we are polyagomus primates and I'll forgive your indignant condemnation.

I just think your losing your touch... Perhaps its late. Re-read Mathew. Your meant to love your challengers...

I'm very happy you recognise my intellectual superiority. It is very intoxicating, knowing that I do have hold over such things. This comes from someone advocating "faith" to our problems? Note, logic actually makes no sense under a theistic universe. I'll keep you in mind when I need a...

You disappoint me... I thought we were friends. :(

If you gave Iron an enema, you could bury him in a matchbox.

Nah man, he's a legit alter boy. I'm not sure if you've posted long enough to see. The arrogance is so irritating though. Its attitudes of such, which stand in opposition to humanities progression and rational thought, which drives people to hate religion. Fancy thinking you know the truth...

Cool man Emotionally reacting again. I challenge you, because on the weight of everything, I hold a more intelligent position. You can't produce answers, because your a slave to a dead system- a slave to well, nothing. Your condemnation does little, given I don't believe in such...

What is right?

Well, as soon as make you make a positivistic claim about this entity, you unfortunately do the work of making the existence of the entity very improbable. Like, most Christians will argue for I.D. (something I vehemntly oppose and for good reason). At best, this arrives at deism. Huge...

Yes, yes I do. You can't prove to me morality actually exists beyond the very framework of evolution.

Iron knows deep down that his position has serious philosophical problems. I've yet to meet a theist who can answer any substantial questioning. Its a wrong position which will be slowly weeded out of existence. IMO the theory of memetics demonstrates how religion spreads. Like all...

The opposite. The propogation of the species is better served when men spread their sperm around.

Seriously though, you know the majority in the discussion do not believe in this god hypothesis. Frame your response within the commonality of what we all know is true, science. Noting, stability of children was not an issue 100 000 yrs ago. Surviving and simply having children was the issue...

An interesting thought I have been having all night, is slightly nihilistic. If we accept that "morality" is simply a contingent term within an evoltuionary framework, i.e. to describe how we have adopted common behavioural standards to live by over time, perhaps asking questions about...