Search results

Can't bloody sleep...... This is the slowest night of my life (not sure if good or bad)

ahh okay, just hoping school ranks don't pull me down.. thanks realise !

really want those double 9s :(

For MX1 I already did it last year and got 96/100 (probs like 64-65/70 raw) and MX2 I'm predicting around 88-90 raw (using carrotstick's solutions) What do you think realise?

Can you give me an estimate Adrita? (This is worst case scenario) MX2 - 96 MX1 - 96 Eng Adv - 89 Chemistry - 91 Physics - 88 What I think I can get: MX2 - 97 MX1 - 96 Eng Adv - 91 Chemistry - 92 Physics - 90

Manhattan isn't too bad i agree, but i still think its a bit more challenging than De Broglie.. First 2 foci for Q2Q is a breeze.

Acid lowers the pH of bacterial living conditions, inhibiting their growth, responsible for the killing of bacteria. This increases the shelf-lives of food, thus preserving it.

Brother told me a guy in his grade last year got 85 raw, and got 95 exam mark. I'm gonna be so pissed if my low rank for physics costs me a state rank. :angryfire:

I was actually quite disappointed actually. Was expecting a harder response like about Manhattan or Standard Model, where it would stump most of the state. :/

How did DE Broglie blah blah increased our knowledge of the understanding of matter? Led to heisenberg and pauli which have also aided in the understanding. Ah, i dont know haha I did Q2Q first, so was probably too excited LOL hope to get at least 5-6

Yeah i think so, acceleration has a direction, which determines the direction of the force.. Force would have been better but I guess it's sort of the same idea.

Talked about the Light wave-particle nature led de broglie to establish his wave-particle duality --> Support by Davisson and Germer --> Explained bohr --> Heinsenberg --> Pauli Conclusion

1) b 2) d 3) a 4) a 5) d 6) c 7) a 8) d 9) b 10) c 11) b 12) a 13) d 14) b 15) a 16) d 17) b 18) c 19) c 20) b Tossing up between 17 b or d.. probably determines my 19/20 or 20/20

Thought the exam paper this year was more difficult than past years, but I think I did pretty well :sun:

^

Wth aren't you meant to use reduction and oxidation

It's not, you had to use the standard potentials table and you'll get a negative answer for the E cell, like -0.34 or something can't remember, meaning you have to supply voltage

I think that's a bit high.. Haha according to realize, that's first in state

What would you guys predict my HSC mark if I got around 85 raw? (Pretty sure I got higher but worst case scenario). And I think E4 cut off could be a bit higher like mid 70s

Nope shouldn't matter though