I do actuarial studies and heaps of people (about 8) from my school who did 4u dropped out after just a year because the math was too hard. You might wanna take a bridging course or something cos if you go in with only knowledge of 2u youre going to find it incredibly hard
yea its crazy how well they play when they have the press going. legit looks impossible to score against them hah hoping they beat the cats so we wont have to play them next week but i also have my hawks/cats/pies/blues multi to worry about
yea haha thats one of the best things about AFL, something that NRL could never match, the crowds are just phenomenal. Was watching bits and pieces of the saints freo game was awesome every time kozi and milne got the ball
That game was at AAMI though and it was clear Collingwood didnt turn up to play, Im fairly certain the playing group have learnt from that as well they know they have to play at their best if they wanna beat port.
Doing a single degree is fine, and you dont need to have a coop scholarship to get hired or anything. If you feel as though doing a double degree is worth while then you should give it a go. btw its spelt 'actuarial'
hahah i support the pies as well nice to know im not alone,
Actually played rep cricket with jarrod witts lol
put $50 on the pies to win tonight at $2.40 should be a good game
hey sorry for the late reply i dont log in all that much anymore, but nah i dont have any past papers unfortunately, sorry =( all the best with your exams and that
chill out mate, the course has changed since last year, he siad he didnt know about the 'total payout' concept you were talking about not bonds and equities
So i understand the tests for normality for a specific data set, but if were to compare 2 data sets, how would I go about determining which of the 2 is relatively more normally distributed when neither of them are in fact normally distributed?