Search results

hedonism is really the way to go in my experience.

Strawman argument, he asked "how a relationship between two males or females would be detrimental on society? What direct harm would it cause?" A relationship need have fuck all to do with marriage. The question he asked makes no demands at all on children, government or church.

I find it fanciful this concept of people having rights 'if they wish'. How is a child born into poverty supposed to enforce their right to healthy food under the current system? Individual freedoms are mostly desirable among adults, but the state has a responsibility to at least intervene...

Homosexuality consumerism straw man tenuous non-sequitur cbf putting the other words here.

What a dick

The three hosts certainly could have, in the same way that they could have replaced a smashed diff or driven a range rover inches from death.

The government already controls what we can drink by the mandatory dosing of our water supply with the poisonous industrial waste byproduct fluoride.

When did I suggest the government was making responsible decisions? I completely agree with you, the present government is incompetent, so their current policy of free market food availability is equally incompetent as the electorate that voted for them. A government that did know better than...

It's indisputable costs in the health care industry are rising due to obesity driven by the availability of unhealthy food. Both taxes to fund the public system and insurance for those in the private system are rising in line with the incidence of obesity. Most obese people don't just drop dead...

I went to the trouble of making a lovely card with paint and glitter and glue, don't ask for anything in return, sure I'm no chamelia but I put much love into it, and what thanks do I get? Jeez some people.

Would have been nice if there was any cultural stuff and interaction with people, but it was pretty long as is.

I wonder how real any of it was, like obviously the hosts didn't really build bridges or fix the cars at all themselves and I have no problem with that, but crossing that dodgy bridge, and even driving with supposedly no brakes, suspicious.

I bought one that was pre-wrecked.

Wrecking a TL isn't worth shedding tears over, not a patch on an SP1.

http://www.smartraveller.gov.au/zw-cgi/view/TravelBulletins/Helping_to_Fight_Child_Sex_Crimes_Abroad

How else could the crime be prosecuted, they can't give diplomatic immunity to all foreigners. Hypothetically, what if the country this man had been a citizen of had declared heroin trafficking completely legal? And then he had been sent back to that country where he is be innocent. The...

The point is the Australian government hasn't legally challenged Japanese whaling in an international court, a case which they would likely win.

Rudd did a good thing. Australia 'seriously' considering whaling challenge | Reuters

Much of the hunting in the southern ocean is in Australian territorial waters, Japan is signatory to international agreements recognizing Australian sovereignty in these areas, but the government doesn't persue it for whatever reason. Australian govment would have every right legally to fuck...

Well for example you could get a 1994 FZR600 for $2500. or this http://cgi.ebay.com.au/1994-Suzuki-RF900R_W0QQitemZ130353975877QQcmdZViewItemQQptZAU_Motorcycles?hash=item1e59b3d245#ht_1247wt_958