Search results

that would greatly benefit me lol. :)

posted some of my thoughts here --> http://community.boredofstudies.org/1125/mathematics-extension-1/330064/hmmm.html

From what I have heard, at least 5 students at my school think they've got 100% and after cross-checking answers, they are making such claims. Interested to see how the moderation process and provision of state ranks pans out....

+1 :)

I've provided some explanations for MC here --> http://community.boredofstudies.org/1125/mathematics-extension-1/330064/hmmm.html

thought it was a straightforward paper, easier than most years. here are my answers for MC (100% sure they're right, after checking with others) with some explanations: I will be posting answers and explanations for the rest of the paper soon :)

did this as well :lol:

fudge it. often determine how you will fudge it by working backwards from the required result.

watching old ncis eps until I have to leave the house :)

no worries :)

Good luck all :)

actually a double bump! :D

learning prelim economics :/

bumping this for tomorrow's 3U, because Carret's tips are invaluable :D

to be specific, last year was 67% :)

Use the index of your textbook and search up the trading blocs/international organisations you are discussing, and then flick through any sections about it in your textbook for useful information. Utilise that as a starting point. :)

but imo it's ambiguous wording so dw bout it :)

the key words are "placed together". this implies they were drawn one by one.

I don't remember any 3u kids ranking higher than 4u kids in 3u :/

what I am saying is if a student doing 3units of maths is performing that well in 3u such that they're outperforming 4u students, then they've made a mistake in my eyes of only doing 3u.