Search results

regardless of the fact that everything you said is wrong, the death penalty isn't reserved for murder. you're simply rationalising the death penalty because you think we live in a just world.

@dannolan Yo, dude just unlocked twin MP5's on COD! Gnarly!

because he was brought up by the internet

well that's certainly an easy way to write off the beliefs of the quarter or so of christians that are protestants and believe in predestination as the solution to the paradox of free will or theologians who purport the inherent but not total omniscience of god. what's more important to...

god answered my prayers and gave me the most beautiful boyfriend eva

columbine shooters: mass murderers or time travelers?

this guy. you have not addressed the fact that a principle of constitutional law in the US is that constitutional practice liquidates constitutional meaning. indeed you have written off the declared opinion of a fucking chief justice (did you even read it? it has nothing to do with...

so excellent a king, that was to this hyperion to a satyr

if you kill all the other contestants you win by default port arthur spelling bee 1996

colon cancer more like communist cancer

i wouldn't have won my seventh grade spelling bee without a gun

Beware the Jabberwock, my son! The jaws that bite, the claws that catch! Beware the Jubjub bird, and shun The frumious Bandersnatch! He took his vorpal sword in hand: Long time the manxome foe he sought -- So rested he by the Tumtum tree, And stood awhile in thought. And, as in uffish...

holy shit, can you quit wanking all over the constitution? you are making a mess everywhere. i have quite clearly provided you with the declared opinion and thus precedent of a chief justice of the supreme court, an opinion that has not been challenged. constitutional practice supersedes...

not in my burqa's backyard

ronald mcpaul

this guy... seriously first of all, the US president is commander-in-chief. if every war since world war II has been illegal, explain why no president has been impeached for this reason? if you can't explain that (and i know you can't) then your point is without a leg to stand on. besides your...

because buddhism isn't the basis of the oppressive thai monarchy, or the atrocious tyranny of the buddhist (lama) regime in pre-1950 tibet, and there have never been buddhist terrorists (oh wait aum shinrikyo, death squads in thailand) why do people always wank over buddhism?

al goro

no

in all australian states, the respective crimes act makes it illegal to wear items of clothing with explicitly intimidating or defamatory text on them. get government out of my wardrobe decisions!!!!!!!!!!!!!!