Search results

If this upsets you so greatly then use the 'contact moderators' forum. I'm getting sick of seeing your complaints all over the general forum, if this place annoys you that much you should stick around less. Sorry for the stern words but I'm sure I'm not the only one feeling this way.

lol thag http://bigpond.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/bigpond.cfg/php/enduser/std_adp.php?display=content&p_faqid=5586

Well yea that's my point... If people aren't kissing I don't think they're in love. I think you can abstain from sex and still be in love but at the very least I think you need to be kissing each other.

I really can't imagine that, at the very least they would pash each other... if not then what separates them from a close friend? Maybe I've never had real love but I imagine a relationship without any form of sexual activity is at best a close friendship. If someone can come forth with an...

Yea but I think most of those people break that promise. They do exist though, for sure.

I think what's happened here is you've accidently mistaken one for the infamous 'beer schlong' which is definately only for girls... and adventurous ones at that.

I somewhat agree, but I don't think it's the same level of murder (i.e. while it is murder, it is murder on a yet to be developed, unconscious being) and because of that I feel it's justifiable but not something we should be happy about.

Well that's a difference of opinion. It is a part of the human species for sure, but it's still developing much of what is needed to be a complete human being. I agree with the first example, but I don't agree that you could roll it back. I think at the very least in the first trimester in...

Oh hi Bshoc, still waiting to hear your arguments on this topic.

So you can't believe a embryo isn't yet a fully formed human deserving the same rights as one?

Eh it's probably a smarter move, if you give kids a little bit more room to move they might really not have sex before marraige.

CRITICAL JOURNALISM - Do atheists need to shut up? 2 christians and a jew decide.

AJ's actually just a superstud.

No Lengy, I really hate all races other than... polynesians and aboriginals? (I'd probably be ignorant and throw them in with asians but meh).

Hates jews, Hates blacks, Hates whites, Hates Asians. Pick any one.

No, you can't explain a thing as to how God does what he does without envoking magic - It's terribly circular. I've already responded to that in two ways: While you may wish to say God is 'very likely a natural event etc' (if God exists he is by definition natural) but what you need to...

No, I don't think so. You're no more right to assume something supernatural was the cause when there's no other explanation than you are to assume something supernatural was the cause when there is another explanation. Reason being that another explanation doesn't in any way falsify the...

Wait, ok, but my point was to explain that it's no more rational to accept a supernatural explanation where there is no other explanation than it is to accept a supernatural explanation where there is another explanation. The naturalistic explanation doesn't falsify the supernatural one in any...

I wouldn't care, not that the question really matters irl much as most of us have basically the same tastes in humour imo. Wait, who wouldn't want to have fun or hang out with someone that doesn't like having fun? :/ Maybe you just define fun from the bounds of what you find fun?

No sam, you tried to provide a distinction and you failed. No I can't, but I can say that Gods existance is in the same realm as all those other supernatural things. Not only can't I (if you want to go back to the start of everything) but I don't think I need to. It doesn't matter if we...