Search results

thank you ... can you send me your one and i will have a look please ?

Hey, I was just wondering if you were able to help me with Lifestyle Chemistry from the senior science course. I need to make an experiment using lifestyle chemistry and test a claim of one of these commercial products (body wash, shampoo, soaps, etc) and design and perform a scientific...

dear all, i just signed in to realise there are over 8000 pages of new posts but more interestingly... that this debate is still ongoing LOL let me guess the athiests are still trying to confuse everyone with semantics ? lol thats what they were doing back in 07. anyways, dont believe...

dear chocolate cake, i reckon he should be refused bail for having what could be accurately described as a faily prominent nose. "he's got a bloody big nose hasnt he?" LOL i hope u enjoy ur chocolate cake! peace, sufyan.

I dont think anyone in my school doing that paper would have scored 100 but very close to it. Im predicting the highest mark to be 96 My friend, who is a maths genius found it a little challenging in some places, especially the binomial question right at the end..which i had no clue about! I...

Hey did everyone remember to double differentiate (or alternatively use the table) after finding the value that minimises her time in the marathon? Cos I forgot. Overall, I found it to be easy. Yepp, Q6 definitely the hardest. Q8-10 was fairly simple. I was stuck on the scientific notation...

(1) Why are we describing the nature of propositions? (2) I thought that was pretty simple. The state of relying on or needing someone or something for aid, support, or the like. Etc... (3) It doesnt have to be a being. It is something/someone which we normally refer to as a 'being'

Omg. The first thing I said when I joined this thread was that I'd be talking it in terms of (what I believe to be) the two qualitites or similarities between all things that exist. Okay, fine. I shouldnt have used '3 distinct forms'...but come on people...is that seriusly something to rave on...

Dude, the only reason I didnt continue the second part of what I believe does prove the existence of a God is because the first part is so damn controvertial. And after all those replies to the 'limited' argument, im sure you'd agree. Theres no point continuing my argument if who im talking to...

My point is that all that we preceive is definitely limited. The complications are coming from your side of the argument. Your twisting and turning that one statement I made. I find this more confusing than anything else. We'll be able to alter humanity? Yeah, so what?

Dont worry, Im not that type.

True. Youll alter the genetic make-up of humans. Youll do that to plants. Youll alter on the atomic and molecular levels. Youll alter the universe. Wow. That doesnt alter the fact that man will still be limited. The universe will still be limited in nature. Man only grows to a certain height...

The arguments people use to say that God does not exist assume duality and finiteness. Which are flawed. You cannot apply duality or finiteness to 'The Creator of all that exists' - God. For instance, the periodic table. Did it come about by chance? Then all life on this planet is by chance...

No scientist has been able to bring definite evidence that suggests the universe has no limits. So to suggest that it is infinite means we are going beyond the bounds of what we can rationally assess. Sucha thought requires us to challenge ourselves to find any example in our world of preception...

So your thinking along these lines: "I know that all that we percieve is limited...but how does anything we know necessitate the existence of an unlimited Creator." Correct?

I know the 'limited-dependant' and 'ad infinitum' arguments may have been used before. But this thread is about 275 massive pages. I read back a bit...but I cant exactly read all 275 pages...so how about a continuation of the philosophical side of proof? Begin by observing all that is around...

Hello people. God does exist.

Judaism exisited 2000 years before Islam? What Judaism? Pharaseeic Judaism? Seduceeic Judaism? Samaritan Judaism? Essene Judaism? Which Judaism do you refer to? Bearing in mind the TaNaCh gives many narrations of how 'monotheistic' the Jews were... Clearly, my friend, your academic ability...

LOL, no evidence in Islamic Science? Your whole religion is based on Islam! RaMBaM (Maimonides for the non Ivrim) used Islamic Jurisprudential Techniques and theology in his compositions MIshneh Torah, Moreh Nevuchim and even the 13 Principles of Faith. Sadly, he used them 400 years after the...