Search results

Define 'good'.

I think you guys should enrol in Extreme Integration (MATH1052), or if you're feeling ambitious try Insane Integration (MATH3025)! PM me for details.

I guarantee you boredsatan will not follow these. __________this is planned. He will follow these rules to prove me wrong. §§§

Read the second paragraph (Uses in Relation to Properties) of that response. You get two main properties: biocompatibility and biodegradability, along with their uses.

5/10/17 6/10/17 28/10/17 Give a demonstration of how you would do it.

Do you understand why?

This is a worthless comment. It depends on the person.

How do you know Gabrielle Miller is considered "beautiful" to all people?

Yeah, you are right. Need to clarify what is being measured. Assuming little error in those estimated probabilities, how did you even come up with that? Sure, it may make sense intuitively but have you verified it? Have you confirmed that those numbers are indeed true?

Mate, "hotness" is subjective. If you want to argue "hotness", then you lay must out an definition that would reach objectivity. Also, Gabrielle Miller is not necessarily "hot" for everyone. It's all a matter of opinion. Cheryl Cole beats her in my books.

Woops, arithmetic error. Thanks, I will take note of that in the future.

Still astonishing that you remember this stuff. Unfortunately, your basis cannot produce x^2 - x - 2. _____________________________________________ \begin{align*}p(1) = 0 &\iff (x-1)(ax + b) = 0 \quad [\text{where }a,b \in \mathbb{C}]\\ &\iff ax(x-1)-b(x-1) = 0 \\ &\iff \mathrm{span}\{x-1...

2 b) is a subspace. What do you need to prove for 2 c) to be a subspace?

Instead of flossing your teeth, psychologists floss your brain. Flossing the brain takes work and most people are not going to do it for free.

Have you resolved your problem?

The stoichiometric ratio should be 1:2:1:2... This school has lost all credibility. This means you would need to halve the n(KI) (or double n(Pb(NO3)2) if you want to compare like that) (WHY?) which leads to KI being the limiting reagent. Essentially, the balance equation tells us that 1...

Upon searching "fizzycyst" on youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCYHJDAmOL3OTyxeM9V_xC1g

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hu7hmiIR2aQ Has the tools that you want.

Why would they do such a thing? Need to flip equation, introducing more negatives...

No worries. Feel free to shotgun me in the mouth if I had taught you something wrong. :)