Search results

SAM -> 99.55 JUI -> 99.65 Einstein -> 99.5 UAI -> 99.45 ROFL xD

Man I was absolutely stoked with my results.... can't believe it!!! Eng(Adv) 86 Maths Ext 1 100 Maths Ext 2 98 SDD 96 Physics 92 RE 42 xDDDDDD CRAZYCRAZYSHIT

ROFLMAO remember that documentary on michael jackson a while back??? you struck me as his type is all but anywho ^^ + here buddy " Money really doesn't buy happiness, study finds Feb 13 12:19 PM US/Eastern Money doesn't buy happiness, and now there's a study to prove it. Australian researchers...

you know what they say...... ppl who make LOADS of money ... and i mean LOADS OFTEN are compensating for something they have very little of......

roflmfao!!!! i seriously would laugh my HEAD off if he doesn't get first in the state cause THEN he'd be crushed..... ahahhahahahahahahahhahahahahahahhahahahahahahahhahaha

im hoping for 95 + really, but realistically probably about 92..? maybe a bit more? so yeah its ok.. not the greatest

I thought evolution of programming languages was really really easy: they let you choose which historical reason for developing functional, and one of those historical reasons is like a massive dot point! --> progrtammer productivity so you could speak so much about that and then you had 2...

yeah that's pretty true ^^ it was a good exam in some respects, open ended questions here n there as well so as long as whatevery ou wrote answered the question it was good

did anyone do evolution of programming?? or did you all do developers view on the hardware??? was pretty happy with the exam.... finished it in 2.5 hrs , some bits of the paper were tricky though... hoping about.. 92-95+

used up 7 booklets, 1 and a half for each question except 23. Didn't need to write too mcuh with 23 --> it was mainly algorithm and DFD stuff so you know and i never do a draft of dfd's =/ teacher usually gives me full marks or a mark off so im usually ok not doing a draft but it was alright XDD...

i thought hte mc was alright.. pretty certain about everything apart from question 2 as well =/ i got exactly the same as ajdlinux

ahahah that's exactly what I think too ^^ good luck with all your exams too!!! still so curious about what terry lee says about it too T_T i wanna know!!!! *whines*

should be, from reading the extension i threads, apparently the exam was pretty hard (albeit not as hard as last years, but still pretty hard) so you should still get e4 for that hopefully, i wonder how e4 translates out of 100 thought , probably double the mark. and funny that i dont wanna be...

did awesome mate!!! came out thinking 100% looked at terry lee's answers and now 83/84!!!! loving it!! =DD and congrats on the 75! that's quite an achievement too ^^

yeahh i still support my reasoning, but i guess i understand yours a bit, im just relaly glad that this whole topic didnt confuse me for 3u today XDDD

OHH ROFLROFLROFL alright then XDDD I thought you did that in the exam and just reproduced it. CAuse you're like I lost 10-12 marks, and you freaked me out cause I was soo confident at what i did that im pretty sure i got 99-100% T_T freaked me out XDD but still 70+ /84 if a pretty good mark...

eh.... hmmm i dunno i got the same as you.... =/ but im sure i got everything right as well =S

i suppose i see what you're saying... still not really convinced but nywho, this argument could go on FOREVER xDDDD has terry lee replied yet?

i dont know if you can use binomial =/, because for binomial to work you need to have repeating elements but in a basket full of 24 balls, once you take one out you dont put another one in to replace it you know what i mean?

ahahah from there you would've gotten it correct then! if you didnt multiply by two then you would've gotten the right answer =] so in fact you were SO CLOSE , just that 2 threw it off =[ and that last pose i made was the the one about me taking the question seriously xDDD i didnt see you wrote...