Search results

he has also been critising reynolds if that helps. ive read one of those sms articles and he is such a prat. plus i totally disagree with his views on history. he says that the evidence itself will restrict the purpose for which it can be used. perhaps, yet the historian's bias is not...

haha warren is soo funny... he is talking about Jenkins and keeps adding comments in brackets-like Jenkins says.... (i think) and he seems overy fond of the word "indeed" every 5 sentences. anyway who talks about objective history, subjectively. warren does. contradictory man.

ehey are all these like "po mo" coz im rather into impressionists like monet..his "bridge over pool of water lilies" (what a name) is my absolute favourite artwork ever.he is fantastic.