Search results

I wrote about Johnathan Banks. He won some award for some ozone crap and works for the CSIRO. I couldnt remember exactly what he did, but I hope whatever I wrote was convincing enough. I doubt any of the markers would realise if you just made the name of a person up.

i thought the exam was pretty good. i think i did pretty well. one thing, now i know i did this right, - but that question about the line of best fit - had someone not taken math for year 11 & 12 yet still chosen earth - they would have been fucked!

...not as bad as i thought but that's not saying much. thank god maths is OVER.

its my last. i have three in a row - gen. maths, earth and modern. FUCK!

i had the nationalist leaders question in my trial and was marked correctly for including us presidents. my teacher at first had his doubts, but later cam to the conclusion that nationalism was the motivation for their movement as the were attempting to stop the spread of communism and ensure...

too much to learn in a period. society is easy.

fingers crossed then.

What are the odds of an essay being entirely on Australian involvement in Indochina? Coz, we really did shit all. Our history is boring as hell.

i guessed the essay question 'Assess the military and political reforms of Horemheb' in its exact wording. i rule.

shelley why the hell would u write so much - what did u fit like one word to a line? honestly man, the booklet for section 2 was that big for a reason. Section 1: 7 pages Section 2: 1 booklet Section 3: 7 Pages Section 4: 9 pages

i kept confusing the names nefertiti and nefertari as i used them both for the two queens essay. luckily, i picked up on it half way through and changed it. phew.

i agree. it oughta be scaled higher simply because you have to know sooooo much. like, those historical periods are HUGE.

that stupid social status thing confused the fuck out of me. i thought i better cover all grounds so i wrote a bit about his childhood and background and some shit on his role as pharaoh (akhentaten that is). what stupid wording.

basic questions. think i did well. guessed one of the essay questions. go me.

I finished with about five minutes to spare - but i was writing like mad. This exam MUST become 2.5 hours! That extra time would allow a much more detailed and well structured response for each section.

Who else has a hand that now feels like a rock from this exam?

i always have problems with time management, but today seemed ok - kept my eye on the clock. i'd wish i could have written more - but i guess i said everything i felt i needed to say. this exam needs to be 2.5 hours. ancient 2morrow.... fuuuuuuck.

i only just squeezed my last piece of related material in during the last five minutes. phew. this exam really needs to be 2.5 hours!

how long was ur response? i only filled 6 pages on each - i would have liked to have done a bit more, but time did not allow and my hand is KILLING ME!

'You have studied two texts composed at different times. When you compared these texts and their contexts, how was your understanding of each text developed and reshaped? Answer with reference to your study of IN THE WILD" This was another great question. Very straight forward. I feel...