haha well tis a bit late because i suppose by now you'll already have found out what you got into because offers were a while ago. i would've said not to give up hope because fringe mean 5% i think of all offers in the first round were made below that enter. clearly -in is clearly-in: it does not automatically disqualify you if you got just below. and i think 1.1 is a good margin.
for me i was always optimistic. look at the data figures for media comm at melb from last year- the clearly in was like 98 or something ridiculous, and the % of offers below the clearly-in score was listed as more the 50% of the people who applied. don't quote me on these though, its what i remember of the top of my head from study the vtac guide this year.
i filled in all 12 prefs, got my enter score and was only sure i would get into my 5th pref (melb science) cos i was optimistic. and from a 87 enter I got into biomed sci first round (which from memory was like a clearly-in of 91+). I was expecting 2nd or 3rd round maybe but not 1st! mucked up my plans because i was overseas at the time and at melb you can enrol online but monash u have to use a proxy
but i got 5 prefs up my list so i'm not complaining.
i know 1.1 seems like a lot because of clearly-in, but i said to myself- fringe is like the score at which 95% of offers are made above(hehe i was like 2 whole enter scores of my courses fringe from last year) - why shouldn't i be one of those lucky people who get in not having the clearly-in score? the chances of getting in with an enter 1.1 rankings below the clearly in aren't that bad if you think about it. if not, you DEFINATELY have a chance 2nd or 3rd round