independantz said:Wtf? I never saw this Q.
I KNOW!!!
Let's complain to the BOS . (or not)
But seriously. I almost think I'm crazy because I did *not* see it.
independantz said:Wtf? I never saw this Q.
has anyone other then the one guy above confirmed that this q was there? Don't get how i could miss it >.> easiest 2 marks in the paper aswell just pltting a graph lol...dolbinau said:I KNOW!!!
Let's complain to the BOS . (or not)
But seriously. I almost think I'm crazy because I did *not* see it.
LOL I saw the graph and immediately just drew the line for Y, then I looked around and couldn't see a Q asking for it and started thinking that I just wasted about 5 minutes drawing an uneccessary graph, then I noticed the Q at the very top. It did ask for you to plot Y- 2 marks.independantz said:has anyone other then the one guy above confirmed that this q was there? Don't get how i could miss it >.> easiest 2 marks in the paper aswell just pltting a graph lol...
That's what I got.adnan91 said:I got r = 7.8ohms
Yeh, i used that. But using the values off a line of best fit is more accurate than simply using one of the values from the table. Which is the point of lines of best fit.dolbinau said:Kearnzo V=IR.
Hopefully yay.adnan91 said:If i remember correctly the voltmeter was placed in parrellel with the wire and did not include the resistor so i dont think we needed to subtract 2 from our answer. Would be fine if u just wrote V=IR then subed in values from the graph as in not points from the given. I got r = 7.8ohms
Ditto.proringz said:I got 7.5 ohms using the table
Tritto. (is that a word?) but since I missed the graph it didn't occur to me this value could have been an outlier (considering people who used the graph are getting different results).independantz said:Ditto.
I checked a majority of them and the values all ranged so i jsut left it at that. they ranged from 7.5.-7.8 none of them were the same .dolbinau said:Tritto. (is that a word?) but since I missed the graph it didn't occur to me this value could have been an outlier (considering people who used the graph are getting different results).