A Printing Error In Question 8!!! Question Wont Count!!! (1 Viewer)

[Sourie]

hello

 

[Missngel]

hello

 

[tammer]

what was the error? silly me didnt notice an error at all...

 

[thedoktor69]

There was a typo. They said we had to draw a horizontal line through 300, but that means he made a $300 profit after he spent $300, but thats incorrect. He made a $300 loss, as he had not done any parties at that stage. The lines do not meet.

Dave

 

[NickyP]

I don't get it... I did the question and drew the horizontal line and what not but it went through the line and shoed that after 6 years he started making a profit...but I'm proly worng I'm not very good. are you sure it didn;t count???

 

[KhaLien]

Originally posted by NickyP
I don't get it... I did the question and drew the horizontal line and what not but it went through the line and shoed that after 6 years he started making a profit...but I'm proly worng I'm not very good. are you sure it didn;t count???

yea, i did the same - drew the line where he started making a profit
if I got it wrong, then I hope it doesn't count...

 

[banx006]

i just thought that the striaght line indicated the break even point. because he outlaid $300 so his break even was $300. you cant draw a negative break even point because hence it wouldnt really be viable....anyway how bad was the last one of q28. i crossed the right answer out but yeah and that one were you had to change the annulus formula to r being the subject grrrr

 

[Sarah J]

hmm... seemed OK to me.... but then again, that's me

 

[tammer]

you mean question 28 b) (iii)???

yes well i drew the line so i dunno...

 

[tammer]

yes it does indicate the break even point. it also shows the fixed cost... but its onlt a 1 marker so i dont see that its a big deal

 

[Rednut]

What was the problem? The way i view that it was asking you to put that horizonal line, showing hte break even point at 6 parties and then state that he would need to perform at 6 parties to recover his initial cost.

 

[Marty]

i interpreted it the same way as rednut

cept break even point was 7 parties not 6
ahh well

i cant draw straight lines :\

 

[tammer]

break even was def. 6 parties marty...

 

[spice girl]

just out of curiosity:

how does Sourie do general maths and extension2 maths at the same time?

 

[stressed02]

yeah FUNNY THAT!!!

Also, he seems to have pointed out that there are mistakes in General Maths, Mathematics and 4 unit maths! hmmmm *cough cough bullshit*

he's full of shit, no one listen to him, there is nothing wrong with the answers - only ALOT wrong with this loser.

 

[Marty]

Originally posted by tammer
break even was def. 6 parties marty...

well duh
as 6 x 50 = 300



as i was not thinking in the stupid exam
dirty brain

 

[The Spruce Moose]

did ur lines start from 50 and then upwards

 

[evie]

Originally posted by dado006
did ur lines start from 50 and then upwards

You mean the vertical axes? What are you talking about?

 

[aLaNa]

What was the problem? The way i view that it was asking you to put that horizonal line, showing hte break even point at 6 parties and then state that he would need to perform at 6 parties to recover his initial cost.

that waz wot i got tooooo! And I had heaps time left n i went ova it, n thats wot it is!!!

 

[Clay_Smoka]

I NOTICED THIS BUT JUST DID AS IT SAID, WAS QUITE CONFUSED AT THE TIME. BUT YEAH I THOUGHT IT WAS A STUFF UP. IF IT DOESN'T COUNT DO THEY GIVE US THE MARKS ? OR DO THEY DROP THE MARKS AND WORK IT OUT YOUR MARK FROM 97 OR WHATEVER ?