A question about the justification behind the solution of a problem. (1 Viewer)

Gods_Spear

Active Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2023
Messages
180
Location
In the struggle
Gender
Male
HSC
2024
1717155376376.png
Part i and ii are fine and I managed to solve them, but for part iii i had to go to the solutions. I don't understand why the gradient of AC is tan45, I feel I'm missing something simple and am being a dumbass but I dont get it.

1717155628386.png
 

kkk579

hello
Joined
Jul 24, 2021
Messages
1,668
Location
Sydney, Australia
Gender
Female
HSC
2025
Its because gradient is rise over run or just change in y over change in x. And the formula for tantheta = opposite/adjacent, which is legit just rise/run. Thats why tan45 is the gradient of AC
 

wizzkids

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2016
Messages
332
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
1998
Actually in the solution it would have been quicker to state the law of triangles, sum of the interior angles must be 180o and therefore the gradient of the line CB must be -1.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top