Al-zarqawi (1 Viewer)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Sonic

Socialist Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2005
Messages
435
Location
in sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
davin said:
i think you need to flesh out what you mean a bit more
ok well what i mean is that if ppl really think that fighting is just going to suddenly stop then they're wrong beacuse now its much more than one person its way more complex in terms of:
1) west Vs east
2) islam Vs christianity
3) islam Vs satan
4) america Vs the world
either way u wish to interpret it, its not confined to one man/woman
 

turtleface

Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2006
Messages
932
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2004
Although I express my complete disgust at people who rejoice over the death of others, I have to admit I do not know how I'd react if I was personally affected by that shit he's allegedly done.

Still, I think its possible Bin Laden and Zarqawi and co. are just Goldsteins or scapegoats. We need to follow Big Brother's dictates and what better enemies than our Goldsteins.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emmanuel_Goldstein for people who haven't read Big Brother

I also applaud Michael Berg's response (dad of Nick Berg, who was, according to the U.S. gov killed by Zarqawi). He got totally shafted by the pro bush media though, but he shows he's a man who's not willing to take BS and refuses to rejoice in the death of others.Take a look at these two articles, the media is totally screwed up over there in the U.S., and try to feed him the official party line but its encouraging to see him refuse.

http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0609-27.htm
http://www.newshounds.us/2006/06/09/fox_news_interview_2_michael_berg_speaks_his_truth_two_minutes_is_all_fox_hosts_can_take.php

Source:wikipedia
 
Last edited:

davin

Active Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2003
Messages
1,567
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
i completely disagree with Michael Berg's view, and I don't think its applaudable. And I mean, personally, I would think its celebration not so much that he's dead, but that he's no longer a threat.
I think its completely illogical to say that Zarqawi is not responsible for any deaths, but that Bush is. for starters, Zarqawi has been involved in terrorism far before Bush was in charge.
 

SashatheMan

StudyforEver
Joined
Apr 25, 2004
Messages
5,656
Location
Queensland
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
1 down , many more to go...........

someone prob took his place already.

he wasnt even rich, so killing him didnt dry any terrorist funds.
 

davin

Active Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2003
Messages
1,567
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
a tape has been released saying that they have replaced him now, though its not a known name. quite possibly an alias.
 

turtleface

Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2006
Messages
932
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2004
yeah more of that Goldstein stuff going on. Really it shouldn't matter. All that bunch of rebels is doing is creating a figurehead for the u.s. to focus their propaganda and blame on
 

jafbooth

New Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2005
Messages
2
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
It's not enough to simply kill the man - you have to destroy the idea.
 

sly fly

Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2004
Messages
581
Gender
Female
HSC
2005
Alhamdulilah! :D Although, unfortunately, I don't think it's going to make much of a difference at all.
 

misbahf

You eat bugs.
Joined
Jul 14, 2006
Messages
100
Gender
Female
HSC
2008
Hmmm... he's dead... that's great. BUt maybe nows a good time to start finding Bin Laden?.... i mean considering the War On Terror has been going for 5 years now. Don't you reckon?
 

gerhard

Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2005
Messages
850
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
good Idea,

---

Edit (Generator): Pointless bump, thread closed.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top