MedVision ad

Another Induction Q (1 Viewer)

Sparcod

Hello!
Joined
Dec 31, 2004
Messages
2,085
Location
Suburbia
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
HSC Question

1+2+4+...+2^(n-1) = 2^n -1
LHS to the power of n+1 RHS 2 to power of n

Thanks to anyone who helps.
 

insert-username

Wandering the Lacuna
Joined
Jun 6, 2005
Messages
1,226
Location
NSW
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
1+2+4+...+2(n-1) = 2n - 1


Step 1. Prove for n = 1 (smallest n)

LHS = 1
RHS = 1

I.e. true for smallest n.


Step 2. Assume true for n = k, i.e.

1+2+4+...+2(k-1) = 2k - 1


Step 3. Prove true for n = k+1, i.e.

1+2+4+...+2(k-1) + 2k = 2k+1 - 1

LHS = 2k - 1 + 2k (since, from assumption, 1+2+4+...+2(k-1) = 2k - 1)

= 2.2k - 1

RHS = 2k+1 - 1

= 2.2k - 1 (whenever you have something to the power of k+1, you're multiplying it once more by the base)

= LHS, i.e. true for n = k+1 if true for n = k.


Therefore, since true for n=1, and true for n=k+1 if true for n=k, then true for n=2, n=3, etc.


I_F
 

Sparcod

Hello!
Joined
Dec 31, 2004
Messages
2,085
Location
Suburbia
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
Thanks. Isnt this an arithmetic progression?

BTW for arithmetic series you use T (k+1) + S (k) = S (k+1) dont you?
 

insert-username

Wandering the Lacuna
Joined
Jun 6, 2005
Messages
1,226
Location
NSW
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
This is a geometric series with common ratio 2, since the variable is in the exponent. However, if you are asked to prove through mathematical induction, then you cannot use the series formula. You must use the induction process or you get nothing. :)


BTW for arithmetic series you use T (k+1) + S (k) = S (k+1) dont you?

Yes, the sum of (k+1) terms of an arithmetic series is equal to the sum of k terms plus the (k+1)th term.


I_F
 
Last edited:

Sparcod

Hello!
Joined
Dec 31, 2004
Messages
2,085
Location
Suburbia
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
Thanks buddy. I learnt something. exponentials mean that the base number is the common ratio.
 

Sparcod

Hello!
Joined
Dec 31, 2004
Messages
2,085
Location
Suburbia
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
insert-username said:
Step 3. Prove true for n = k+1, i.e.

1+2+4+...+2(k-1) + 2k = 2k+1 - 1


I_F
Don't get the part 2^k. Where did it come from?
 

insert-username

Wandering the Lacuna
Joined
Jun 6, 2005
Messages
1,226
Location
NSW
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
We have assumed that the statement is true for n=k (1+2+4+...+2(k-1) = 2k - 1). To prove true for n=k+1, you then have to add 2(k-1+1), i.e. 2k, to the left hand side, since the statement is a sum of terms and the (k+1)th term is 2(k-1+1).

I_F
 

Riviet

.
Joined
Oct 11, 2005
Messages
5,593
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
A neater way of doing the LHS=RHS bit is when you get to the line 2.2k-1 , you can just bring the 2 up to the index to get 2k+1-1, and that equals the LHS. No need to go to right hand side and back to left.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top