Really? just 7n? what does 7n meanUmm, Tn=a+(n-1)d, from info, a=7,d=7
Hence, Tn=7+(n-1)7 =7n???
It means:Really? just 7n? what does 7n mean
yea i dont understand what the n-th term means.. someone told me it means anyterm but i still dont get itI think kevinsta has difficulty understanding what 'n-th term' means. Or am I wrong, kevin?
the nth term is some arbitrary number in the set of N. So n can be 1,2,3,..., n-1, nyea i dont understand what the n-th term means.. someone told me it means anyterm but i still dont get it
that's basically what I saidSquar3root's answer is confused.
Here, n is a pronumeral representing a positive integer. The nth term of the arithmetic progression is the term that comes in the nth position, expressed in terms of the pronumeral n. For example, the 1st term (i.e. the term when n=1) is 7. The 2nd term (n=2) is 14. We notice that a term at position n in the sequence is found by multiplying 7 by the value of n. So the nth term is said to be 7 times n or simply 7n.
It's really not.that's basically what I said
What is N? The only valid interpretation I have is that N the set of natural numbers, which is wrong. In general, the nth term of an arithmetic progression doesn't have to be a natural number or even an integer. If you don't mean N to be N the set of natural numbers, then what do you mean?the nth term is some arbitrary number in the set of N
Two problems here. "n can be 1,2,3,..., n-1, n" is nonsensical. You can say "n can be 1,2,3,..., k-1,k" if k is independent of n, but you can't replace k with n. The second problem is that if N is the set of natural numbers as per the previous sentence, then there's no upper bound the value of n that can be chosen. It would be more correct to say "n can be 1,2,3,...", but this does not clarify the answer for OP.. So n can be 1,2,3,..., n-1, n
Sorry about the formatting. Usually I have nice signposting but I am on my phoneIt's really not.
What is N? The only valid interpretation I have is that N the set of natural numbers, which is wrong. In general, the nth term of an arithmetic progression doesn't have to be a natural number or even an integer. If you don't mean N to be N the set of natural numbers, then what do you mean?
Two problems here. "n can be 1,2,3,..., n-1, n" is nonsensical. You can say "n can be 1,2,3,..., k-1,k" if k is independent of n, but you can't replace k with n. The second problem is that if N is the set of natural numbers as per the previous sentence, then there's no upper bound the value of n that can be chosen. It would be more correct to say "n can be 1,2,3,...", but this does not clarify the answer for OP.
"the nth term is some arbitrary number in the set of N" - ohh i see where I went wrong (stupid english). what i mean is that the nth term can be anything but the n in 7n can only be over the set of NI know that n has to be a natural number, but you didn't say that. You said "the nth term is some arbitrary number in the set of N". This is wrong. The nth term of an arithmetic progression can be negative, fractional, etc. as in the progression -1, -0.5, 0, 1.5. ...
The set of natural numbers is not a field.
There's no problem with the choice of the letter n. The problem is with the conflation of "nth term" and "n", as well as the suggestion that n is chosen from some set of integers with an upper bound. n can be any positive integer, so it's incorrect to give an upper bound on this set at all.