Atomic Weight Comparison (1 Viewer)

davidbarnes

Trainee Mȯderatȯr
Joined
Oct 14, 2006
Messages
1,459
Location
NSW
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
Why was the atomic weight of a;ll elements changed from being compared to Hydrogen (to carbon I think?)?
 

alcalder

Just ask for help
Joined
Jun 26, 2006
Messages
601
Location
Sydney
Gender
Female
HSC
N/A
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_weight

The relative isotopic mass is the relative mass of the isotope, scaled with carbon-12 as exactly 12.

Before the 1960s, this was expressed so that the oxygen-16 isotope received the atomic weight 16, however, the proportions of oxygen-17 and oxygen-18 present in natural oxygen, which were also used to calculate atomic mass led to two different tables of atomic mass.
Formerly chemists and physicists used two different atomic mass scales. The chemists used a scale such that the natural mixture of oxygen isotopes had an atomic mass 16, while the physicists assigned the same number 16 to the atomic mass of the most common oxygen isotope (containing eight protons and eight neutrons). The unified scale based on carbon-12, <sup>12</sup>C, met the physicists' need to base the scale on a pure isotope, while being numerically close to the old chemists' scale.
The term atomic weight is being phased out slowly and being replaced by relative atomic mass, in most current usage. The term standard atomic weight refers to the mean relative atomic mass of an element.

Hope that helps
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top