Australian Goods in the Supermarket - Are they for you? (2 Viewers)

Australian goods - are they for you?

  • Yes, I'll always buy Australian goods should they be available

    Votes: 4 18.2%
  • No, I'll buy the brand/item that meets my expectations, no matter its country/ies of origin

    Votes: 13 59.1%
  • Eh, I'd prefer Australian goods, but I have other priorities and as such really couldn't care

    Votes: 5 22.7%

  • Total voters
    22

loquasagacious

NCAP Mooderator
Joined
Aug 3, 2004
Messages
3,636
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2004
Somebody needs to get 'enlightened' one and sparcod some economics quick smart.

Complete lack of understanding of the most basic economics. You're arguing for things proven to be against the best interest of the country almost 200years ago.
 

yy

Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2004
Messages
287
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Enlightened_One: comparative advantage?
 

_dhj_

-_-
Joined
Sep 2, 2005
Messages
1,562
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
I fail to see your logic. How can sending money out of Australia help our economy? You claim that it will make us more competive, but because of our standard of living, if we want to compete with the third world countries who work for a dollar a day then we have to do the same. Do you really want to degenerate our standard of living?
I'm afraid this observation is emotive and inaccurate. Refer to basic economics - comparative advantage. These so called 'third world countries' have a comparative advantage in the simple manufacturing and textiles sector.

Whilst there are real social issues arising from structural change (the shift away from clothing and textile industry, for example) in Australia, there is a real benefit for consumers and merchandisers. Cheaper goods result in a rise in real income and consumers are free to spend money on other goods, thus further stimulating the economy. The accumulation of a trade deficit may adversely affect our external stability, and place the economy in danger of a financial crisis. However, Australia's external stability situation is distinguished from that of South American economies, for example due to the fact that its external instability exists almost solely in the private sector.

International trade and the freeing up of protection has in general, a positive impact on global living standards. Generalities, of course cannot be pursued as unquestionable doctrines. The regional inequality arising from the shutting down of factories, for example is a real concern. Semi-skilled and unskilled workers retrenched as a result of production cost-backs may well pose a drain on taxpayers in terms of the welfare and retraining costs they are entitled to. But structural change per se is not what I see as the major problem posed by Globalisation in the aspect of regional specialisation. The main concern seems to be the narrowing of occupational choice in individual geographic locations and the increasing need to travel overseas to fill the shortage in labour for the relevant industry. This may result in further disintegration of the family unit and social interaction, but it may also be somewhat overcome by improved telecommunications and transport technologies.

Anyway, does no one realise that the economy is built upon falsities. At the end of the day all the high paying jobs and our large human resources, middle management, whatever-it-calls-itself sector does not actually produe anything. If we keep under-cutting our industries then we'll be importing only and not exporting, thus sending our money away with out getting returns.
I hope you didn't expect to get away with having such a 'blood and soil' mentality...
 
Last edited:

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 2)

Top