Beat frequency question (1 Viewer)

erucibon

Active Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2018
Messages
210
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
The question asks:
Consider the diagram which shows one soundwave (drawn as a transverse wave X) and the resultant wave, Z, formed as this wave is superimposed on another, lower pitched wave (not shown). The frequency of X is 120Hz. What is the beat frequency of the resultant wave?
(The answer is 118Hz)
The question gives a wave graph of X and Z but i'm not sure how to use this to do the question.
Any help is appreciated
Thanks
 

Drdusk

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Feb 24, 2017
Messages
2,021
Location
a VM
Gender
Male
HSC
2018
Uni Grad
2023
Can you attach the diagram?
 

Drdusk

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Feb 24, 2017
Messages
2,021
Location
a VM
Gender
Male
HSC
2018
Uni Grad
2023
Hi sorry for the late reply, been at uni all day.
There's two possibilities here, either you've accidentally looked at the wrong answer or the answer is just wrong. We know that



If 118 Hz is the correct beat frequency, then it would mean Hz. This is impossible. Beats only occur when the two frequencies of waves interfering are very close together. This has a difference of 118 Hz!, impossible to get beats with a difference that large.

I think its a typo, because 118 should instead be the frequency of Y, so beats can be observed.

And just to make sure, I went into my Lecture Notes for Physics, and yes it says this phenomenon only happens when the two waves have slightly different frequencies..
 

erucibon

Active Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2018
Messages
210
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Hi sorry for the late reply, been at uni all day.
There's two possibilities here, either you've accidentally looked at the wrong answer or the answer is just wrong. We know that



If 118 Hz is the correct beat frequency, then it would mean Hz. This is impossible. Beats only occur when the two frequencies of waves interfering are very close together. This has a difference of 118 Hz!, impossible to get beats with a difference that large.

I think its a typo, because 118 should instead be the frequency of Y, so beats can be observed.

And just to make sure, I went into my Lecture Notes for Physics, and yes it says this phenomenon only happens when the two waves have slightly different frequencies..
Sorry, I read the answer wrong. It is 2Hz, but how do you get this value?
 

Drdusk

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Feb 24, 2017
Messages
2,021
Location
a VM
Gender
Male
HSC
2018
Uni Grad
2023
Sorry, I read the answer wrong. It is 2Hz, but how do you get this value?
Wait I'm so confused, then what was 118Hz given for?

Was that given as the frequency of Y? If that's the case just use the beat formula I gave you above.
 

jazz519

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Feb 25, 2015
Messages
1,956
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
Uni Grad
2021
Maybe measure the axes and make some type of scale.

Because it says 200 hz frequency for the first graph. Recall that period is inverse of frequency

So T = 1/f = 1/200 seconds

Then think about definition of period (one wavelength on a time axes)

Then I guess that tells you that is 1/200 seconds and then maybe measure the axes for the beats graph period and make some type of scale between them

That’s just a suggestion as to where the 118 maybe came
 

Drdusk

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Feb 24, 2017
Messages
2,021
Location
a VM
Gender
Male
HSC
2018
Uni Grad
2023
Maybe measure the axes and make some type of scale.

Because it says 200 hz frequency for the first graph. Recall that period is inverse of frequency

So T = 1/f = 1/200 seconds

Then think about definition of period (one wavelength on a time axes)

Then I guess that tells you that is 1/200 seconds and then maybe measure the axes for the beats graph period and make some type of scale between them

That’s just a suggestion as to where the 118 maybe came
Yeah I thought of that too, because it doesn't say "not to scale", but since he doesn't know how to do the question how did he end up with the number 118Hz anyway.. because if 2Hz is the actual answer, then 118Hz should be the frequency of Y. So Idk if its just a coincidence or what. You get me?
 

jazz519

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Feb 25, 2015
Messages
1,956
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
Uni Grad
2021
Yeah I thought of that too, because it doesn't say "not to scale", but since he doesn't know how to do the question how did he end up with the number 118Hz anyway.. because if 2Hz is the actual answer, then 118Hz should be the frequency of Y. So Idk if its just a coincidence or what. You get me?
Yeah I get what you mean
 

erucibon

Active Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2018
Messages
210
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Yeah I thought of that too, because it doesn't say "not to scale", but since he doesn't know how to do the question how did he end up with the number 118Hz anyway.. because if 2Hz is the actual answer, then 118Hz should be the frequency of Y. So Idk if its just a coincidence or what. You get me?
The question after that asks to calculate the frequency of Y, which is 118Hz
 

Drdusk

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Feb 24, 2017
Messages
2,021
Location
a VM
Gender
Male
HSC
2018
Uni Grad
2023
The question after that asks to calculate the frequency of Y, which is 118Hz
Ah okay then you would just do what Jazz said. In that case we know . Now period is defined as the Time between successive Wavelengths. We can use this to develop a scale for the two waves. Using that definition for period and your ruler by measuring the wavelength of X in cm, you can develop a scale for the two graphs, something like Then just measure the wavelength in Cm for the Beat Graph and using that scale find the Period of the beat frequency wave. Then use to find its frequency.

I must say this is a very annoying and crap question. Like seriously measuring the actual scale...
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top