urgh the majority of the test was data-processing. i think most people thought it was relatively easy but i found it hard to gather enough info to meet the mark value for some of the questionsHow was the exam
Same i thought there was too much data analysis, and not enough content. Also noticed they didn't assess a lot of topics.urgh the majority of the test was data-processing. i think most people thought it was relatively easy but i found it hard to gather enough info to meet the mark value for some of the questions
thank uu - no pressure though, there is a strong likelihood I read it wrong and mixed up the words. I once read an entire 5 mark question wrong for a diff subject and then realised as I went to re-read the question to write my link sentence and had to start all over again #just flaunting my wide content knowledge to the markerIf i get time, ill go through the MCQ once the scanned version is out of the hsc
i put they had the wrong shape or something along the line, cause they worded the homologous one weirdwhat was that mc that said a student made a model of meiosis in somatic cells and we had to say what was wrong with it?? shouldn't one of the options have been it should've been occurring in germ cells? Please don't tell me it actually said mitosis and I read that wrong lmao
Right but on an average exam what raw mark would usually align to b6?If its stimulus based as you said, the average mark will be much higher so it will scale worse.
How'd you find the paper? NESA usually uploads the paper a few days after but sometimes it can get leaked a bit earlier...The answers are the following:
1. B
2. C
3. A
4. B
5. B
6. D
7. D
8. B
9. D
10. B
11. A
12. A
13. C
14. A
15. C
16. C
17. B
18. A
19. D
20. D
So what would a 88-90 align to roughly?This exam was on the lower end of difficulty. Comparable to 2021.
So most likely 84
View attachment 36857