SoCal
Hollywood
7 GPA = 99.5 UAI.hk31 said:thanks
what about a GPA of 7?
7 GPA = 99.5 UAI.hk31 said:thanks
what about a GPA of 7?
Only eighteen minutes now! I have been hanging out all morning. The time is going so slow.evilc said:27 minutes Merethrond
I'm so damn nervous
High Distinction Average ---- GPA 7 = 99.5 UAIhipsta_jess said:i never knew time could go so slow!!
so we know the top two converted thingies, what about the ones below a D average?
Merethrond said:High Distinction Average ---- GPA 7 = 99.5 UAI
Distinction Average ---- GPA 6 = 96 UAI
Credit Average ---- GPA 5 = 89 UAI
Pass Average ---- GPA 4 = 83 UAI
.
are you serious?Merethrond said:High Distinction Average ---- GPA 7 = 99.5 UAI
Distinction Average ---- GPA 6 = 96 UAI
Credit Average ---- GPA 5 = 89 UAI
Pass Average ---- GPA 4 = 83 UAI
.
From what I understand, for the calculation of your GPA, they only take into account your grade, but for the calculation of your WAM, your actual mark is used.hipsta_jess said:hey, another question (not sure if its been asked elsewhere), they dont take into account your mark when calculating your gpa or whatever do they?
so they dont care that a 74 is better than a 65, just that their both C's?
What do you mean?cayte said:How does the cut off from one point to another work in the GPA, ie when does a D average become an HD? Does it round to the nearest whole number or what? The whole system seems pretty dodgy to me. It oversimplifies the differences between individuals.
as far as i understand it, no. there is only one possible HD average - a GPA of 7.cayte said:Exactly, but from your raw marks you have an HD average, so is a 6.8 for instance, an HD average?
Yeah, that is correct. Any GPA from 6.0 to 6.9999.... is a Distinction Average. There is no rounding up or down.Frigid said:
as far as i understand it, no. there is only one possible HD average - a GPA of 7.
a GPA of 6.8 would be a high Distinction average, not a High Distinction average.
the GPA is a bit like the tax system - it suffers from bracket creeping!Generator said:I agree with cayte... It is a dodgy system. The WAM is more precise (and much more important, too).