Cambridge vs New Senior Mathematics (1 Viewer)

i1337

Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2012
Messages
41
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Which has the best explanation and exercises? I noticed NSM 3u has one book for year 11 and 12 3 unit maths. It seems to be less pages than the combined Cambridge. Is it because the questions are just less repetitive? Which would be better to learn from (self study, maybe a few casual tutoring sessions but nothing more)
 

davidgoes4wce

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2014
Messages
1,878
Location
Sydney, New South Wales
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Fitzpatrick explains thing in a more reader friendly way. I understood it alot more clearly reading Fitzpatrick book first. Personally, feel that alot of students studying Extension for the first time would get a bit lost with the terminology used in Cambridge if they were doing certain topics for the first time.

Cambridge explains things in a more theoretical way. Cambridge explanation is more closer to HSC standard and university style maths.

I think in the Foreword of Cambridge they do mention that the purpose of the book is not to do every question. (They make a suggestion to do as many questions until you understand the concepts) There are 3 phases: Beginning, Development and Extension questions. If you knock off the majority of the Development questions it should be enough to get an E4. If you do knock off the extension questions, then an E4 is a certainty.

It would not be a stupid thing if you went to an easier text say Grove as well as they explained Binomials quite well , circle geometry as well.

I hardly touched Circle Geometry back in my high school years, so have been going back to the 5.3 texts (year 10) to brush up on some aspects as there is an overlap with extension 1 Year 11 maths.
 
Last edited:

RyanT7

Active Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2016
Messages
266
Gender
Male
HSC
2017
Fitzpatrick explains thing in a more reader friendly way. I understood it alot more clearly reading Fitzpatrick book first. Personally, feel that alot of students studying Extension for the first time would get a bit lost with the terminology used in Cambridge if they were doing certain topics for the first time.

Cambridge explains things in a more theoretical way. Cambridge explanation is more closer to HSC standard and university style maths.

I think in the Foreword of Cambridge they do mention that the purpose of the book is not to do every question. (They make a suggestion to do as many questions until you understand the concepts) There are 3 phases: Beginning, Development and Extension questions. If you knock off the majority of the Development questions it should be enough to get an E4. If you do knock off the extension questions, then an E4 is a certainty.

It would not be a stupid thing if you went to an easier text say Grove as well as they explained Binomials quite well , circle geometry as well.

I hardly touched Circle Geometry back in my high school years, so have been going back to the 5.3 texts (year 10) to brush up on some aspects as there is an overlap with extension 1 Year 11 maths.
Would you say doing half of the development questions in the exercise would suffice for an e4 In Mx1 ?
 

leehuan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
5,805
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Would you say doing half of the development questions in the exercise would suffice for an e4 In Mx1 ?
More than definitely. Maybe every second question in the development section would suffice.
No. Past papers hold much more precedence over any textbook's questions.

It just so happens that certain Cambridge questions do actually reflect exam quality questions decently well.
____________

@OP yeah Fitzpatrick is probably a lighter read to learn the actual content but whilst both are good in questions, Cambridge has an edge
 

eyeseeyou

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2015
Messages
4,125
Location
Space
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
No. Past papers hold much more precedence over any textbook's questions.

It just so happens that certain Cambridge questions do actually reflect exam quality questions decently well.
____________

@OP yeah Fitzpatrick is probably a lighter read to learn the actual content but whilst both are good in questions, Cambridge has an edge
DatAtarLyfe told me that a terry lee (4U) is very good as it is on par with the past papers
 

RyanT7

Active Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2016
Messages
266
Gender
Male
HSC
2017
No. Past papers hold much more precedence over any textbook's questions.

It just so happens that certain Cambridge questions do actually reflect exam quality questions decently well.
____________

@OP yeah Fitzpatrick is probably a lighter read to learn the actual content but whilst both are good in questions, Cambridge has an edge
Alright, let me rephrase this then. If you did the first half of the development questions, should you be able to do all of the questions in past papers ? Kind of a broad question, but just need a brief answer
 

leehuan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
5,805
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Alright, let me rephrase this then. If you did the first half of the development questions, should you be able to do all of the questions in past papers ? Kind of a broad question, but just need a brief answer
Quite a lot? I'd hope so

All? That's hard to say, because the final few marks are not that easy to just "see" what to do.
 

davidgoes4wce

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2014
Messages
1,878
Location
Sydney, New South Wales
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Alright, let me rephrase this then. If you did the first half of the development questions, should you be able to do all of the questions in past papers ? Kind of a broad question, but just need a brief answer
I think you need to mix up a few 2nd half of those development questions as well. The first half of the development questions are a tad easier than the second half of the development questions. Ideally , something reasonable like every 2nd question in the development section is a good idea.
 

davidgoes4wce

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2014
Messages
1,878
Location
Sydney, New South Wales
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
I hardly touched Circle Geometry back in my high school years, so have been going back to the 5.3 texts (year 10) to brush up on some aspects as there is an overlap with extension 1 Year 11 maths.

I also tutored a student this weekend and he told me (boys school which I prefer not to say), their school hasn't covered Circle Geometry in Year 10. So it looks like I wasn't the only one who didn't learnt it at that time. (So I guess I'll give home some extra work in that area when I see him next). Im aware that educational companies like Matrix cover that material in the period April-June for their courses for Year 10 students, which is a massive advantage for those students. I also don't know about you guys, but studying Circle Geometry from a coloured textbook, I pick up the concepts a lot better than reading from a black and white text. Also starting to think of it now, there is a fair overlap with Prelim Maths Extension and Year 10 Stage 5.3 maths. (e.g Circle Geometry, Polynomials, Trigonometry/Trig graphs/Trig identities, Probability (Tree Diagrams, Venn Diagrams, Tables), Functions and Other Graphs, Logs).
 

leehuan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
5,805
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Circle geometry is one of the lobes in 5.3

Not every school gets far enough as to teaching them
 

leehuan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
5,805
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
I forgot as well. Someone else will know.
 

leehuan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
5,805
Gender
Male
HSC
2015
Good school.

But it's the same impression I have with any schools ranked above 350. It's just a school
 

Drongoski

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2009
Messages
4,239
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
My impression is Newington is a reasonably good but expensive private school - about same level as Barker, Riverview, Ravenswood, the King's School and PLC Croydon but not academically in the same league as Sydney Grammar. For the IB programme, I'm surprised that MLC Burwood has had quite a few outstanding years lately.
 
Last edited:

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top