can MP be refered to as non./discretionary? (1 Viewer)

coroneos

Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2003
Messages
679
Like is it incorrect to say that MP is a discretionary or non-discretionary action by the RBA/Govt.

I know that you can use (non)or discretionary to describe FP, but what about MP?
 

Newbie

is a roflcopter
Joined
May 17, 2003
Messages
3,670
Gender
Male
HSC
2003
erm.......i think its discretionary.........well its an optimistic assumption that the RBA is still in control of rates :D
 

coroneos

Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2003
Messages
679
Originally posted by Newbie
erm.......i think its discretionary.........well its an optimistic assumption that the RBA is still in control of rates :D
Are you sure it can be classified as discretionary? Can't we only refer to something as being non-discretionary or discretionary when we are describing the cyclical/structural components of the federal budget??
 

timmii

sporadic attendee
Joined
Nov 9, 2002
Messages
928
monetary policy is discretionary in that the RBA does determine what the i.r's will be. I suppose if u wanted to be all philosophical about it, u could say that interest rates that actual prevail in the market can be non-discretionary depending on bond yields etc...but thats not monetary policy per se...

So yeah, u would never have to refer to MP being discretionary/non-discretionary. The reason u have the distinction with fiscal policy is that some components of the budget result from what the government *chooses* to do in pursuing its own political/social/economic agenda, and some (e.g automatic stabilisers) come about as a result of economic conditions, that the government has not actually made a conscious decision to modify/alter revenue/spending there.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top