ok, im goin to make it easy for you so you can understand.ohwhenthesaints said:Mate, you have got to be kidding, seriously. Firstly, the players that are leaving this year are irrelevant, as they still helped you win the premiership. Hutch and Scott are leaving to look for opportunities, there was basically no room for them in your starting side, don't make them out to be big losses. Thurston was basically unwanted because of certain behaviours, and was happy for the chance to 'escape' to the Cowboys. Price, that one has to hurt, but he was sick of being associated with the filth that goes on in your club, and the Warriors offer was too good to refuse. The loss of Vagana is countered by Willlie Tonga AND Jamal Loolesi, not bad for a club supposedly losing all these players. Norton and Rauhihi were not big losses, solid players sure, but the club had to look like they were getting rid of players. Andrew Ryan as a replacement isn't too bad. You should have lost 600k of players THEN, you're only losing them "since then" because of the rise of SBW and Asotasi. I think it's pretty clear and hard to dispute that you are being rewarded for cheating the salary cap, and it shows that cheating the salary cap is worth it. Sacrifice one year to win it 2 years down the track. If you did not cheat 2 years ago there is no way you would have assembled this squad, it would be spread amongst 4 clubs, which also means it might have meant no premiership.
Interesting stuff there. I'm getting a little confused as to the point you're trying to make with all these 'stars' that have left. I would say most other fans would be able to make a similar list of players who have left their club. I know that this year alone Saints have lost Shaun Vidito (Eels), Henry Perenara (Eels), Nathan Blacklock (Hull 2yrs), Wycliff Palu (NSW Waratahs), Beau Scott (Sharks), Brett White (Storm), Michael Howell (Raiders for 2yrs), David Howell (Raiders for 2yrs), Brett Firman (Roosters for 3yrs), Mark Riddell (Eels for 3yrs), Brent Kite (Manly for 4yrs), John Olzard (burleigh- Qld Cup), Tony Jensen, John Carlaw the retirments of Wille Leyshon, Andrew Frew and Nathan Long as well as the possible departure of Lincoln Withers. I'm not disputing the fact that the Cheats are under the cap now. Hell, their accountant would have to be nothing short of a genius if you were still cheating it and not getting caught.Suney_J said:ok, im goin to make it easy for you so you can understand.
here's a list of players we've lost :
Glen Hughes
Shane Marteene
Steve Reardon
Willie Talau
Darrell Trindall
Nigel Vagana
Gavin Lester
Darren Smith
Travis Norton
Paul Rauhihi
Steve Price
Jonathan Thurston
Dennis Scott
Hutch Maiuva
Glen Hall
and these are just the ones i know of. Now how much do you think all these guys are worth, way more than $600K, and that frees up alot of space under the cap, and dont start talkin shit of why they left, that fact is they left and the point is alot of space was left and the only big name signings we've had are Andrew Ryan and Jamal Lolesi. i do admit they're not all big losses, but since the salary cap applies to the top 25 players at the club and not just the first grade squad, they still make a difference to the cap
and you made the point of Sonny Bill and Willie Tonga, well in case you forgot this is only their first year of first grade, and when they signed their contracts last year they wont well known and thus didnt get a huge offer. Ofcourse their value has sky-rocketed this year, but the point is they're not being paid how much they're worth now coz their contract specified their salary for this year and next year,(same thing applies to Reni Matuia and Roy Asotasi) so dont think they get piad like superstars, they even live together with Reni Matuia in a house in Belmore owned by the Bulldogs
Thats true about willie being well known - but brian smith wasn't dumb not to realise it - he put him on the side as much as he could, but unfortuanetly, willie didn't show some of the great stuff he had in him until he went to the dogs.nerd2die4 said:willie tonga was well known before he reached the bulldogs. it's just the brian smith was too dumb to realise this.
shes left BOSnerd2die4 said:I have one question
WHERE IS LOZ?
this is the time she comes out and in big bold letters and goes 'fuck you all'. where is she?
Why would I bother doing that? They are celebrating with fellow Bullcheats fans on their own forum, good on them. I know how much I hate it when other supporters come onto Saints forums. But when you or other Cheats fans want to talk about it on a general sports forum you can expect to get other people's opinions. Sometimes you may not like what you see, (i.e. when it's shown you're team are rapists and cheats), but if you don't like it stay at the kennel and talk to your fellow fans.Shifty said:ohwhenthesaints, it seems like you like arguing and arguing so i put it to you, to visit "thekennel.com.au" and see how far you can argue with the people who know their facts inside out.....
whats there to lose.....register to their forums for free and try persuade them that the bulldogs cheated their way from 2002 to this years grand final victory...... after all you do know so much about the game and you are always correct with you assumptions and arguments.........btw youre not the first jealous dragons supporter around......i spose i would be jealous if my team played like a bunch of under 6's every second game
when the Bulldogs cheated 2 years ago, they didnt pay all 25 players under the cap extra, they secretly spent extra cash on around 11 or 12 players which led them to be over the cap, and only 4 of those players remain. so when you say we have the same squad as 2 yrs ago, only 4 players were involved with the rortohwhenthesaints said:The point I'm trying to make, which I'm sure would be quite clear to most other people to, is that this victory occurred because you cheated 2 years ago. You were punished then, but what's the point if you are able to win the competition 2 years later with virtually the same squad. That is my point. The reason you won this year was because you cheated 2 years ago.
nerd2die4 said:willie tonga was well known before he reached the bulldogs. it's just the brian smith was too dumb to realise this
Misturi said:Thats true about willie being well known - but brian smith wasn't dumb not to realise it
how can you all miss the point? i didnt say he wasnt known, i said he wasnt well-known, coz if he was he would've attracted bigger offers, but since he wasnt we were able to offer a relatively low salaryohwhenthesaints said:Alot of people were talking about him, and yes as Nerd said, Brian Smith is the only one in the world not to realise his potential
thnx for confirmingohwhenthesaints said:Cheaterbury did very will to pick him up at such a low price
We had some bad refereeing against us as well.......for eg. Utai catching the ball in-goal and mander awarding a dropout, and walker dropping the high ball and mander allowing the play to continue....bennynoel said:The Bulldogs only won because of bad refereeing -
Minichello's second try, it wasn't a shepherd
El Masri's try was a double movement
Also, on the rape thing, it did happen, i know for a fact it did, and Willy Mason was the ring leader in the incident
Another thing Mason tested positive to using Cocaine earlier in the season but because the test was done within the clubd they kept it internal and covered it up
hey timbk2, nah sorry mate, ive been trying to look for that hit all over the place too... I might have to download the entire game and cut out that cliptimbk2 said:hey shifty. nice sig!
do you have sbw's hit on joel clinton a few weeks ago
No it wasn't a joke, and it wasn't a shepherd, there were still 2 guys there to make the tackle.Shifty said:We had some bad refereeing against us as well.......for eg. Utai catching the ball in-goal and mander awarding a dropout, and walker dropping the high ball and mander allowing the play to continue....
Haha, Minichello's second try wasnt a shepard, i just hope that was a joke because if it wasnt, you have embarrassed your self with showing that you have no knowledge of the rules.
Once again weak knowledge of rules, El Masri didnt reach from outside the goal line, he was over the goal line and was entitled to get up and have another crack....it is the roosters faults for not holding him up..
LOL, So you know the rape happened for a fact ay, quick get to your local police station and inform them that you have facts that prove a rape occurred.
Whoever tested positive (and its not Mason, the club has now confirmed this) for the Bulldogs, did it in house. That's why he wasn't named, they were trying to help him.
A shepard occurs when you run behind a player from your team without releasing the ball, Minichello was clearly seen doing this and was rightly penalised. Its a rule buddy, whether you like it or not.bennynoel said:No it wasn't a joke, and it wasn't a shepherd, there were still 2 guys there to make the tackle.
Yeah it was a double movement, he wasn't entitled to get up and have another shot because both roosters had hold of him and his momentum was nil.
Yeah the rape did occur, but its all been covered up and dealt with. And won't get out because the NRL is trying to clean up its image.
It was Mason, the club just doesn't want people to know that their Norm Smith Medal winner took recreational drugs, its exactly like John's 2 years ago with his "neck" injury, that was just a cover up because he tested positive to recreational drugs.
Mate are you serious? "They only spent extra cash on around 11 or 12 players which led them to be over the cap". These were the players who were getting the illegal payments but it doesn't mean these were the only players who were being overpaid. If these 11 or 12 weren't being paid extra, their money would have come from the rest of the squad. The fact that the rest of the squad had their full contracts listed under the cap does not mean a thing. They were being paid above their market value, which was made possible by the cheating, and also meant that when the Bullcheats were caught, they were able to take "cuts" back to their actual value. I can't actually remember the players who were being overpaid, could you post them up and how much they were getting? From memory the Hughes brothers and Anasta were getting a shitload extra, but Price wasn't??Suney_J said:when the Bulldogs cheated 2 years ago, they didnt pay all 25 players under the cap extra, they secretly spent extra cash on around 11 or 12 players which led them to be over the cap, and only 4 of those players remain. so when you say we have the same squad as 2 yrs ago, only 4 players were involved with the rort
I like it how you break up my sentences to put them out of context. I don't think any of us missed the point? We stated that he was in fact well known. If Brian Smith his coach had realised this, the club would have made a bigger offer which would have increased his value. I know Saints were very interested but already had Gaz and Coops, oh and that salary cap thing. You said he wasn't well known, we said he was. How is that missing the point?Suney_J said:how can you all miss the point? i didnt say he wasnt known, i said he wasnt well-known, coz if he was he would've attracted bigger offers, but since he wasnt we were able to offer a relatively low salary
thnx for confirming
Drugs and rape aside, that is a ridiculous post. Yes i too know for a fact that the rape happened, alot of people do, but there isn't much use arguing about it in here. But how can you say they only won because of bad refereeing? I agree with Shifty on this one.bennynoel said:The Bulldogs only won because of bad refereeing -
Minichello's second try, it wasn't a shepherd
El Masri's try was a double movement
Also, on the rape thing, it did happen, i know for a fact it did, and Willy Mason was the ring leader in the incident
Another thing Mason tested positive to using Cocaine earlier in the season but because the test was done within the clubd they kept it internal and covered it up