MedVision ad

Changing bounds (integration by substitution) (1 Viewer)

ooo

New Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2014
Messages
2
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Suppose my substitution was x = u^2 -1
When changing bounds, do I take u = +- sqrt(x+1) ? Explain why.
 

FrankXie

Active Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2014
Messages
330
Location
Parramatta, NSW
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Uni Grad
2004
Suppose my substitution was x = u^2 -1
When changing bounds, do I take u = +- sqrt(x+1) ? Explain why.
You can take either one, but not both. Because the substitution needs to be one-to-one mapping.
 

ooo

New Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2014
Messages
2
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
No, you can't take either one. You can try it out with a random definite integral; only one will give the correct answer.
 

FrankXie

Active Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2014
Messages
330
Location
Parramatta, NSW
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Uni Grad
2004
No, you can't take either one. You can try it out with a random definite integral; only one will give the correct answer.
are you serious?







Therefore, either one gives both correct answer!
 
Last edited:

SilentWaters

Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2014
Messages
55
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
Still works. We end up with even powers throughout the integrands, making it a case of evaluating symmetric areas under an even function in u.
 
Last edited:

SilentWaters

Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2014
Messages
55
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
Not true.

When you take the limits -1 and -sqrt2, they are in REVERSE order. So you get MINUS the other answer.
Try it.
You forget that we reverse the limits due to the substitution being in the second case. This means that in our integrand the becomes .
 

SilentWaters

Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2014
Messages
55
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
for
Case 1: Integral is
Case 2: Integral is

Perfectly equivalent, as the common 'u' integrand is even.
 
Last edited:

SilentWaters

Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2014
Messages
55
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
Sorry, which substitution has been changed? I stuck with whatever was given in the thread

You always consider both the substitution and the limits for any changes to a definite integral anyway.
 

FrankXie

Active Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2014
Messages
330
Location
Parramatta, NSW
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Uni Grad
2004
Hang on a moment .... You changed the actual substitution.

In Frank Xie's example, he used the SAME algebraic substitution in each case, using the negative version ONLY to get the new limits.

Yes, if you use the minus formula for BOTH the algebraic substitution AND the new limits, you will always get the same answer, but that is NOT what he did, and I was debating the issue based on that premise.
lol. I only change limits but keep other parts unchanged because in my example I did NOT have the term , so I did not need to change the integrand.

I totally agree with SilentWaters. -- He did NOT change the substitution at all
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top