Comp 115, Help Me, Dunno Anything! (1 Viewer)

[redruM]

and you walked out thinking you did alrite back then... =p

yeh...i thought i had gone better than my 69.

i mean i usually dont complain with 69's...but expected more.

 

[Supra]

it wasnt bad it wasnt good i dunno...ill have to wait until the results come out...and as expected, shitloads on arrays, a 30marker final q on classes, a mc or 2 on classes, shitloads on loops

 

[CrashOveride]

fairly easy

there was one question with the reverse digit, exactly like prac,..except i friggen kept multipliyng the wrong thigns so i ended up doing it a weird way :/

onto 151 we go =p

 

[Catastrophe]

i think i just...either scraped PC or failed

i tried the classes question, but i just made up bs which i dont think will get any marks...arrays i just done like

for (i=1; i<n; i++)
if (A<A[i+1])
temp=A;

swap (A, A[i+1])

something like that.....most questions follow that format...

say if i got 90/180 raw mark, would it scale down to Fail?

 

[redruM]

my solutions werent very elegant, ie- calling functions like that, etc.

i think you might be safe, in terms of a fail.

 

[:: ck ::]

it was pretty easy...

nothing that tricky.. last one had to think about it for a bit... cause there was too much reading

its kinda bullshit how u say one number, like how many times the loop operates... and thats 5 marks... like wtf..

 

[Supra]

yeh marking scheme is stupid...typical product of the most fukd up dept at macquarie

 

[Catastrophe]

damn, everyone done well.....hopefully that doesnt scale my crappy bs loops down too much..

 

[soul_reaper]

oi
whats the answer for the how many times the loops executed?

the one with hmm
i think its like this or sumthin' and its in the while loops i think

int i = 0;

while ( sumthing...sumthing...)
if (i<7)
i++;
else
i--;

 

[CrashOveride]

i think i had like 7

it had if (true) ..etc etc

 

[soul_reaper]

oi
did u guys write any comments for the section b and c?
i.e should u explain the code with few line of comments?

 

[CrashOveride]

no, the code is basic and self explanatory in itself

 

[stepher]

i didnt know much going into the exam.. so i really cant complain about how i found it.. BUT!! i didnt like the mc. they seemed easy(ish) but i liked it the way it was in the 2003 paper.
and yeh, my coding wasnt very eligant either =S