Complex q (1 Viewer)

helpfulperson?

New Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2021
Messages
18
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
IMG_2991.jpeg
How would you do q2b. I’m having trouble trying to get cos4theta. Thanks!
 

Luukas.2

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2023
Messages
451
Gender
Male
HSC
2023
How would you do q2b. I’m having trouble trying to get cos4theta. Thanks!
Some immediate thoughts:
  • What did you get for 2(a)?
  • Have you noticed the two pairs of differences of two squares on the RHS?
    • And that the resulting terms can be found by rewriting into terms?
 

Lith_30

o_o
Joined
Jun 27, 2021
Messages
158
Location
somewhere
Gender
Male
HSC
2022
Uni Grad
2025
idk if there is an easier way but...

the from part a you get the quadratic factors as


now we use the substitution ,



now lets just look at one factor of that expression, say

expanding into the mod argument form...


now all the other factors can be simplified similarly to get


Now we include the LHS to simplify the expression



as required
:sleep:
 

ExtremelyBoredUser

Bored Uni Student
Joined
Jan 11, 2021
Messages
2,576
Location
m
Gender
Male
HSC
2022
idk if there is an easier way but...

the from part a you get the quadratic factors as


now we use the substitution ,



now lets just look at one factor of that expression, say

expanding into the mod argument form...


now all the other factors can be simplified similarly to get


Now we include the LHS to simplify the expression



as required
:sleep:
never gonna see these qs again, miss those days 😭
 

ExtremelyBoredUser

Bored Uni Student
Joined
Jan 11, 2021
Messages
2,576
Location
m
Gender
Male
HSC
2022
same ngl, back when maths was comprehensible 😢


also bruh for my solution just factor out for each of these . waaaay simpler

yea bro u did it the long way, much more easier just using the identity (e^ix + e^-ix) = 2cos(x) and then its more cleanerr
 

Luukas.2

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2023
Messages
451
Gender
Male
HSC
2023
Attached is a complete solution written in Latex
There are a couple of issues with question 1:

On page 2, you have
but this is not always true:


The simplification only applies over restricted domains like , and the result should actually be


A similar problem arises from the following statement on the same page, that


as this statement is undefined for and incorrect if . The inverse tangent function outputs angles covering only about half of the range of the principal argument.


In effect, this proof establishes the result for some, but not all, possible values of .
 

ivanradoszyce

New Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2023
Messages
22
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2018
Thank-you very much Lith_30. I'll edit those domain restrictions to page 2.
 
Last edited:

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top