MedVision ad

complex roots multi (1 Viewer)

A1La5

Active Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2021
Messages
94
Gender
Male
HSC
2021
I'm not familiar with the method you've use but here's how I would do it:
1629801784236.png

Fairly sure D would be the conjugate opposite of C. As the imaginary parts have opposite signs due to sine being an odd function.
Edit: Forgive me, I forgot cosine was negative in the second quadrant. This is what happens when you do too much English. -.-
 
Last edited:

CM_Tutor

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Mar 11, 2004
Messages
2,642
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Actually, D is -1 x C.

C has negative real part and a positive imaginary part whereas D has a positive real part and a negative imaginary part.
 

mr.habibbi

Member
Joined
Oct 27, 2019
Messages
41
Gender
Male
HSC
2021
Actually, D is -1 x C.

C has negative real part and a positive imaginary part whereas D has a positive real part and a negative imaginary part.
if you find the solution to the complex root, you get a plus minus (±) result, so you can take out or add a minus to (1-i) to get (-1+i) and still get the same result? hence C and D should work right
 

Wizjaro

Active Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2019
Messages
204
Gender
Male
HSC
2021
Yea I think both C and D are valid answers. After all square roots usually have 2 viable answers when involving complex numbers.
 

CM_Tutor

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Mar 11, 2004
Messages
2,642
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
so if we were asked to find the solutions to we wouldn't put the plus minus?
Firstly, I was showing that the values (C) and (D) are different.

But, to answer your question, and remembering that is just a number, how many values does have? The equation has two solutions but only one them is represented by the expression .

The equation has two solutions, , but only one of them is the "positive" square root.

As for how to answer an exam question, bear in mind that context matters and that questions can be ambiguous / open to multiple interpretations.

And as far as this question goes, in choosing the "best" answer, it's clear that (C) is a better answer than (D).

Edited 27 August 2021 to strike above conclusion, after changing my view - for explanation, see below
 
Last edited:

Trebla

Administrator
Administrator
Joined
Feb 16, 2005
Messages
8,391
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
I don't think the question is well written.

If we want to be more technical about it, the problem lies in how you actually define a “square root” of a complex number which is a bit beyond the syllabus.

Strictly speaking (i.e. in "pure maths" speak), a square root of a number a, is the solution to . In the real number system that we're all familiar with, the principal square root is the positive root but we know that the other root is the negative of the principal square root i.e. .

In complex numbers, a similar principle applies. For example, strictly speaking the imaginary unit i is defined as just the solution to . The principal root is which is what most textbooks cite. However, we can technically also define the imaginary unit as as it also squares to give -1.

When you have both real and imaginary parts, you find the principal root on the basis of the principal argument. If

where

then the principal square root is defined as

where

Back to the question, the solution to is


However, the principal square root is the one where the argument is in

This suggests the answer is technically .

If you pay careful attention to well worded questions, they usually ask you to solve x and y where



which avoids this issue completely to get both square roots - as the syllabus only refers to finding two square roots of a complex number.

The subtle difference being that they usually don't (and shouldn't) word it in such a way to ask you to find x and y where



where technically you need to think about finding the principal square roots.
 

dan964

what
Joined
Jun 3, 2014
Messages
3,479
Location
South of here
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
Uni Grad
2019
if you find the solution to the complex root, you get a plus minus (±) result, so you can take out or add a minus to (1-i) to get (-1+i) and still get the same result? hence C and D should work right
Trebla is absolutely correct. The issue has to with symbols. The actual square root sign/symbol by definition means generally means take the positive root (or strictly the principal root). It is only justified to take both roots if the values were originally squared.

Difference between the following:
has 2 solutions since when we square root both sides, we take both the positive and negative root.
has 1 solution (positive root only by definition of symbol )

(where in radians)

Solution D is technically more correct. Because is we take positive root to mean positive in the reals*:
(aka the real component > 0)


(* if the real value is 0, we take the root with a positive imaginary value)
 
Last edited:

dan964

what
Joined
Jun 3, 2014
Messages
3,479
Location
South of here
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
Uni Grad
2019
No, it is not. has a single value.



After line 2 you could argue that you need to change need to convert to be in the range aka
So that when you take the squareroot, the result is in the principal argument range to ensure that the real value of the solution > 0.

So D is justified and is technically more correct. Although I would mark C and D as both correct as it is ambiguous. Which paper was this from (as I might correct it)
 
Last edited:

idkkdi

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2019
Messages
2,567
Gender
Male
HSC
2021
After line 2 you could argue that you need to change need to convert to be in the range aka
So that when you take the squareroot, the result is in the principal argument range to ensure that the real value of the solution > 0.

So D is justified and is technically more correct. Although I would mark C and D as both correct as it is ambiguous. Which paper was this from (as I might correct it)
i think this q has occurred more than once lol. not too sure though.
 

CM_Tutor

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Mar 11, 2004
Messages
2,642
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
I have read the posts from @Trebla and @dan964 carefully. I believe that we are all in agreement that:
  • both (C), , and (D), , are solutions of
  • (C) and (D) are different complex numbers
  • there is an ambiguity created by the use of the square root symbol for te same reason that has two solutions of which is only one. is a decimal approximation to the expression for the square root of two, while we would all recognise that is not... but extending the convention to which is the "positive" square root of a complex number is a matter of definition.
To be completely honest, neither the definition that the principal square root must have a positive real part nor that it must have an argument that is an element of strike me as definitive on first look. However, I have come to the conclusion that both are natural consequences of the definition that does make sense to me. Consequently, I withdraw my earlier statement that (C) is the best answer and agree that Dan and Trebla are correct that (D) is the most technically correct answer.

My reasoning reaches their conclusion from a slightly different route, which is that the principal square root of a complex number in mod-arg form is the square root taken on the complex number expressed that is itself expressed with its principal argument. Thus:


The flaw in my earlier reasoning was that, in expressing as , I did not restrict it to being expressed with its principal argument before taking the square root; rather, I only considered whether the result had a principal argument. Restricting the complex number to its principal argument before taking the square root has the consequences that the restrictions suggested by Trebla and Dan must be satisfied.
 

dan964

what
Joined
Jun 3, 2014
Messages
3,479
Location
South of here
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
Uni Grad
2019
I have read the posts from @Trebla and @dan964 carefully. I believe that we are all in agreement that:
  • both (C), , and (D), , are solutions of
  • (C) and (D) are different complex numbers
  • there is an ambiguity created by the use of the square root symbol for te same reason that has two solutions of which is only one. is a decimal approximation to the expression for the square root of two, while we would all recognise that is not... but extending the convention to which is the "positive" square root of a complex number is a matter of definition.
To be completely honest, neither the definition that the principal square root must have a positive real part nor that it must have an argument that is an element of strike me as definitive on first look. However, I have come to the conclusion that both are natural consequences of the definition that does make sense to me. Consequently, I withdraw my earlier statement that (C) is the best answer and agree that Dan and Trebla are correct that (D) is the most technically correct answer.

My reasoning reaches their conclusion from a slightly different route, which is that the principal square root of a complex number in mod-arg form is the square root taken on the complex number expressed that is itself expressed with its principal argument. Thus:


The flaw in my earlier reasoning was that, in expressing as , I did not restrict it to being expressed with its principal argument before taking the square root; rather, I only considered whether the result had a principal argument. Restricting the complex number to its principal argument before taking the square root has the consequences that the restrictions suggested by Trebla and Dan must be satisfied.
Very well put. One of the main motivations for defining the principal value Arg is to be able to write complex numbers in modulus-argument form. Hence for any complex number z,



So by definition when using Euler's rule or De Moivre's we have to convert our results in be in that interval.
 

CM_Tutor

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Mar 11, 2004
Messages
2,642
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Very well put. One of the main motivations for defining the principal value Arg is to be able to write complex numbers in modulus-argument form. Hence for any complex number z,



So by definition when using Euler's rule or De Moivre's we have to convert our results in be in that interval.
Thank you, and I agree. Once I realised that I was not using the principal argument in expressing , and that doing so would necessarily lead to the conditions that you and @Trebla described, I saw that you had to be correct. Thank you to you both for helping me to see where I was mistaken.

I do hope someone identifies the source of the question so that you can consider adding a note on THSC.
 

mr.habibbi

Member
Joined
Oct 27, 2019
Messages
41
Gender
Male
HSC
2021
Thank you, and I agree. Once I realised that I was not using the principal argument in expressing , and that doing so would necessarily lead to the conditions that you and @Trebla described, I saw that you had to be correct. Thank you to you both for helping me to see where I was mistaken.

I do hope someone identifies the source of the question so that you can consider adding a note on THSC.
cranbrook 2020 4u trials
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top