Conics (1 Viewer)

Affinity

Active Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2003
Messages
2,062
Location
Oslo
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2003
I am quite stuck with this question

P is a variable point on the ellipse x^2/a^2 + y^2/b^2 = 1
S, S' are the Foci of the ellipse. PS, PS' meet the ellipse again at Q, Q' Respectively. The tangents to the ellipse at Q and Q' meet at R. Find the locus of R.

So far I can only get up to

R has paramatric representation:

x=a[cos( (m+n)/2 )/cos( (m-n)/2 )]
y=b[sin( (m+n)/2 )/cos( (m-n)/2 )]

where the following equalities:

e*cos( (m+p)/2 ) = cos( (m-p)/2 )
-e*cos( (n+p)/2 ) = cos( (n-p)/2 )

for some p. ( P = (acos(p), bsin(p) )
(e = eccentricity of ellipse)
holds

and the algebra here looks too daunting :(

guess = might be an ellipse

any ideas is much appreciated
 
Last edited:

Affinity

Active Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2003
Messages
2,062
Location
Oslo
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2003
bashed it, turned out to be an ellipse indeed

x^2/a^2 + y^2/[b(e^2+1)/(e^2-1)]^2 = 1

did anyone find a more *elegant* (easy) way of doing this?
 

Affinity

Active Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2003
Messages
2,062
Location
Oslo
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2003
I did :( still can't think of a better way to do it.
have you?
 

Affinity

Active Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2003
Messages
2,062
Location
Oslo
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2003
What I did was:

Solve simultaneously the equations for tangents at Q and Q' to find R. and found:
R has paramatric representation:

x=a[cos( (m+n)/2 )/cos( (m-n)/2 )]
y=b[sin( (m+n)/2 )/cos( (m-n)/2 )]


Substituted the coordinates of the focus into the equation of the chords PQ, PQ' to obtain

e*cos( (m+p)/2 ) = cos( (m-p)/2 ) (*)
-e*cos( (n+p)/2 ) = cos( (n-p)/2 ) (**)

multiplying * with ** LHS with RHS then solving gives
x= -acos(p)

solving for y was messy :(
y = -b[(e^2+1)/(e^2-1)]sin(p)
 

underthesun

N1NJ4
Joined
Aug 10, 2002
Messages
1,781
Location
At the top of Riovanes Castle
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2010
I did that that way too, and it seems that I can't find any easier way to do it.

I gave it up since it seems very messy, and that there could probably be another way to do it.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top