CSSA chem trial (1 Viewer)

Jenn

Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2002
Messages
60
Location
Sydney
Man i know!!
i put the ph one was 3

btw the nitrogen thing.. i wrote about back titration
the models one was STUPID!!!!!
heat molar combustion? we didnt get that .. maybe ur teacher changed some stuff around

but phys!!!:(
 

Dumbarse

Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2002
Messages
423
Location
BOS moderator & operator
yeh i got pH 3 for nitric acid one, i did ionisation with water to get H30+ concentration, was same number of moles as concentration given so just used the rule ph=-log10[H30+] and got 2.8 something, so pH 3
is that how u are supposed to do it??

yeh i also said back titration
, what did ppl put for the assumptions part of that nitrogen content question??
 
Joined
Aug 10, 2002
Messages
234
Location
Phuket
Originally posted by Dumbarse
yeh i got pH 3 for nitric acid one, i did ionisation with water to get H30+ concentration, was same number of moles as concentration given so just used the rule ph=-log10[H30+] and got 2.8 something, so pH 3
is that how u are supposed to do it??
Yep, that's how I did it too so it better be right
 

lappang

Dunaferr NK soon FCK
Joined
Aug 20, 2002
Messages
82
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
What was the deal with the use witht he modules question that can't ask that its not int he syllabus...i am very glad that we did an internally based chemistry trial aka a cut and paste job of the independent, CSSA and last years HSC
 

schwang_thang

Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2002
Messages
265
Location
sydney
gaynessss!

i hated it...!
they were all damned processing qstns...i want sumthing where u can just regurgitate!
n since when was non/destructive testing in the syllabus? i cant find it! :confused:
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top