CSSA Trial (1 Viewer)

[nerdd]

yep i think the two last extendeds 27 or 28 both needed a case study.
because o/wise ppl without a case study could take an "easy way out" and do the one without the case study.
they'd have to make it as equal as possible.

 

[sneaky pete]

Originally posted by nerdd
because o/wise ppl without a case study could take an "easy way out" and do the one without the case study.
they'd have to make it as equal as possible.

You didn't have to prepare a case study prior in order to answer the question..

 

[PG5]

Originally posted by Kharn
Did you read the rhuberic at the top. If it said that as part of the marking criteria that you need to include a relevant case study then it would be difficult to argue against not using it. I have never know a section 4 that has not at least had it in the rhuberic.

yeah i know that...

but DID it say in the rhuberic?

 

[M o r p h X]

yes it did

 

[PG5]

Originally posted by M o r p h X
yes it did

ok then... oh well... it's only trials....

 

[M o r p h X]

tru dat

 

[truly-in-bliss]

wot were the extended response quesitons??

 

[snakeoils]

mmmm, can i remember...

q26 was the business report, responding to the stimulus business which had financial, marketing and employment relations...

q27 was about methods of global expansion, and management responsibilities to domestic and international stakeholders

q28... i didnt do it... but i think it was something to do with global change or something?

 

[PG5]

Originally posted by Kharn
I have never know a section 4 that has not at least had it in the rhuberic.

2001 CSSA section IV ruhbric:
* Use your knowledge
* Communicate using relevant terminology and concepts
* Present a logical, well-structured answer to the question

ie. no need for a case study..

2002 HSC paper has it though...
* Use your knowledge and relevant business case study/studies

but even though the 2002 hsc paper has it, 2 out of 3 sample band 5/6 papers that i just read didn't include a case study and the other one mentioned nike and coca-cola.

so there is still hope yet... lol
aya... i'll just wait for the paper....

 

[marko]

yeah, with the 2002 HSC paper the put it in the rubric for the first time, and because so many people didnt notice it they took that into account and poeple got high marks even though they left it out...
i wouldnt expect them to be that lenient this time around, but chances are it will be in the quesiton itself this time anyway, as far as i know all ext. response questions require a case study

 

[Dash]

Originally posted by PG5
2001 CSSA section IV ruhbric:
* Use your knowledge
* Communicate using relevant terminology and concepts
* Present a logical, well-structured answer to the question

ie. no need for a case study...

YaY!

Looks like I didnt stuff up all that badly on Section IV after all!

 

[Dash]

Has anyone got their marks back yet???