• Congratulations to the Class of 2024 on your results!
    Let us know how you went here
    Got a question about your uni preferences? Ask us here

Defences to murder? (1 Viewer)

Insanity

Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2004
Messages
46
Location
Sydney
Gender
Female
HSC
2005
Hi, was doing some past HSC questions (2002 to be specfic) and I was wondering in considering for a defence for murder, can complete defences be used? Or is it just partial defences .... ?
 

goan_crazy

Hates the waiting game...
Joined
Sep 28, 2004
Messages
6,196
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
Insanity said:
Hi, was doing some past HSC questions (2002 to be specfic) and I was wondering in considering for a defence for murder, can complete defences be used? Or is it just partial defences .... ?
partial reduce charges to lesser ones E.g. murder -> manslaughter
however complete defences can still be used as an excuse.
 

bEAbEA

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2005
Messages
257
Location
Snowy Mountains
Gender
Female
HSC
2005
complete defences can be used: eg. insanity (but then they would have to be sent to some kind of mental institution), self defence (but it has to be proved that the forces used was reasonable)
However, as goan_crazy said, the partial defences are usually used, and they usually reduce the sentance to manslaughter
 

sly fly

Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2004
Messages
581
Gender
Female
HSC
2005
There are heaps of complete defences that can be used for murder eg: insanity, alibi, accident, automatism etc
 

Aimz- Lou.

Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2005
Messages
148
accident will not necessarily act as a complete defence, but could result in a lowering of the sentence.
 

Jonathan A

Active Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2004
Messages
1,397
Location
Inner West
Gender
Male
HSC
2003
As pointed out there are many defences to Murder. Many are only partial and will reduce the charge to manslaughter. Complete defences include Self Defence and Insanity. The onus of proof in insanity is on the defence, but the onus on Self Defence is on the prosecutor to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant committed murder without self defence (elements under Zecevic v DPP).
 

Lazarus

Retired
Joined
Jul 6, 2002
Messages
5,965
Location
CBD
Gender
Male
HSC
2001
Strictly speaking, a claim that the murder was an "accident" doesn't really constitute a defence - it just makes it more difficult for the prosecution to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused intended to commit the murder (i.e. had the necessary mens rea).

A true defence will exculpate the accused even if all of the elements of the offence are established.

Check out the Criminal Trial Courts Bench Book for a great rundown of the defences, as well as copies of the model statements used by judges to inform juries as to how the legal tests should be applied:

http://www.jc.nsw.gov.au/ctcbb/main.html
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top