MoonlightSonata
Retired
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2002
- Messages
- 3,645
- Gender
- Female
- HSC
- N/A
Brown isn't the clearest book in the world...
I thought you could only seek equity in the equity division of the supreme court?Gavrillo said:Monsieur de Bearpooh, could you explain how Equity is incorporated into "the regular courts"?
My Legal teacher doesn't know...she's an eco teacher...blasted school.melsc said:I thought you could only seek equity in the equity division of the supreme court?
Thats the advantage of having a legal teacher who was a lawyer...although he sometimes bring out the uni textbooks when he feels the textbooks aren't adequateGavrillo said:My Legal teacher doesn't know...she's an eco teacher...blasted school.
let it be reminded that what poohboy is referring to is the UK Judicature Act.bearpooh said:Before the Judicature Act of 1873, there actually was a seperate
and parallel system of equity courts.
The Judicature Act moved Equity into the regular courts.
Hey Frigid, what law units have you done or doing atm?Frigid said:i'm still half-drowning in the murky waters of homicide... trying to distinguish all the categories of murder and manslaughter at the moment
sorry, i simply don't have the answer. ask squishy.
Personally I find equity boring...thats probably coz I don't quite get itbearpooh said:I only know about English Equity
Once I finish my english equity books, I start on Gummow and Meagher,
I promise.
done:Demandred said:Hey Frigid, what law units have you done or doing atm?
done:Demandred said:Hey Frigid, what law units have you done or doing atm?
in addition, if you read Patrick Parkinson's 'Tradition and Change in Australian Law' (like you good foundations kids ought to), you would note that equity and common law should not be seen as two separate systems.bearpooh said:Professor Ashburner said famously, that "the two streams of jurisdiction, though they run in the same channel, run side by side and do not mingle their waters "
On the other hand Lord Diplock claimed that it was ridiculous to talk of two different systems when in reality they had been fused over a 100 years ago.
may i respectfully decline, since i have too much reading on my hands at the moment. have you done your reading for torts yet?bearpooh said:May I suggest that you read the prefaces ( yes, all of them ) to Meagher and Gummows textbook on Equity.
I have heard many rumours about the amount of reading...some say if you have X hrs in "class" *whatever you call it * its about 3 times that in reading...how much reading do you guys do?Frigid said:may i respectfully decline, since i have too much reading on my hands at the moment. have you done your reading for torts yet?
For Ancient subjects, I spend about 3x reading of lectures and tutes (3 hours of lectures and tutes per week / 9 hours of reading per week), for Modern and everything else, I spend about 3x reading of lectures (2 hours of lectures / 6 hours of reading per week).melsc said:I have heard many rumours about the amount of reading...some say if you have X hrs in "class" *whatever you call it * its about 3 times that in reading...how much reading do you guys do?
Lucky I am a fast reader :uhhuh:
About 50 pages+ average before a tute/seminar per subject on average. In frigid's posting font size. My eyes hurt.melsc said:I have heard many rumours about the amount of reading...some say if you have X hrs in "class" *whatever you call it * its about 3 times that in reading...how much reading do you guys do?
Lucky I am a fast reader :uhhuh:
So that's why he types that size...he's used to itsantaslayer said:About 50 pages+ average before a tute/seminar per subject on average. In frigid's posting font size. My eyes hurt.
Per subject as in per law subject.
Yeah, that's about the same for me. I've read about 20 A4 pages, and about half way through, and this is for one tute/lecture pair.santaslayer said:About 50 pages+ average before a tute/seminar per subject on average. In frigid's posting font size. My eyes hurt.
Per subject as in per law subject.