Do you have objections to eating farmed dolphin/monkeys etc (1 Viewer)

[Yasser Arafat]

idk a lot of people believe pigs/dogs etc are sentient

 

[Yasser Arafat]

Why do people [/quote]
You mean westerners, I assume.

im sure some orientals object to eating them lol

 

[Iron]

Id happily tuck into a whale if I thought it was sustainable etc. You go around the Victorian coast and the roots of many of the fine historical townships are in whaling. How grand, I say.
I think the biggest issue is probably economic. Cleverer animals are less likely to cooperate in their destruction, like the finely docile cow or sheep. Also, they tend to have less bang for their buck, I say. Not like a big beefy cowberg who will happily munch away all day, filling his many grand stomachs

 

[Kwayera]

Id happily tuck into a whale if I thought it was sustainable etc. You go around the Victorian coast and the roots of many of the fine historical townships are in whaling. How grand, I say.
I think the biggest issue is probably economic. Cleverer animals are less likely to cooperate in their destruction, like the finely docile cow or sheep. Also, they tend to have less bang for their buck, I say. Not like a big beefy cowberg who will happily munch away all day, filling his many grand stomachs

They also tend to reproduce less often.

 

[Iron]

They also tend to reproduce less often
probs bc they think themselves intelligent by using evil contraceptives

 

[Yasser Arafat]

yeah like i said dont think about whether it is economically feasable to farm whales lol for the purposes of this assume that it is

 

[Iron]

that's bs

 

[Uncle]

greenpace is already at this.
hurling rotten shit to mashimaro whaling ship.

and the japanesu retun the favor with Flashbangs lol.

 

[pman]

If you can teach an animal to talk (like the did with monkeys and sign language), then it is a sentient being, therefore, by my definition, monkeys, whales amd dolphins are all sentient so we shouldn't eat them!

 

[Yasser Arafat]

If you can teach an animal to talk (like the did with monkeys and sign language), then it is a sentient being, therefore, by my definition, monkeys, whales amd dolphins are all sentient so we shouldn't eat them!

dogs can talk

parrots can mimick

all animals can communicate to each other like whales lol that is such a confusing statement

 

[Uncle]

Hmmm i guess i'm suspicious of eating pigs and shellifish - as they are nature's garbage disposals. Shellfish are known to have concentrations of up to 30 times the levels of pollutants in the water - these 'filter feeders' digest food in such a way that contaminants are absorbed into the flesh - they exist to purify the river or stream they inhabit for fish etc.

As for pigs - On examining the swine’s anatomy, we find that, as a supplement to his bad appetite he has but one poorly constructed stomach arrangement, and very limited excretory organs generally. Consequently, in about three hours after he has eaten his polluted swill, putrid carrion, or other offensive matter, man may eat the same in second-hand style off the ribs of the pig.

Compare this to a cow with 5 stomachs etc you can see that these shit eating failure animals are bad for us - not to mention fattening.

but wr cant breed all oyster for pearls fpr jewry/


jewellery i mean

 

[Yasser Arafat]

Hmmm i guess i'm suspicious of eating pigs and shellifish - as they are nature's garbage disposals. Shellfish are known to have concentrations of up to 30 times the levels of pollutants in the water - these 'filter feeders' digest food in such a way that contaminants are absorbed into the flesh - they exist to purify the river or stream they inhabit for fish etc.

As for pigs - On examining the swine’s anatomy, we find that, as a supplement to his bad appetite he has but one poorly constructed stomach arrangement, and very limited excretory organs generally. Consequently, in about three hours after he has eaten his polluted swill, putrid carrion, or other offensive matter, man may eat the same in second-hand style off the ribs of the pig.

Compare this to a cow with 5 stomachs etc you can see that these shit eating failure animals are bad for us - not to mention fattening.

lol serious talk only okay

 

[Iron]

If you can teach an animal to talk (like the did with monkeys and sign language), then it is a sentient being, therefore, by my definition, monkeys, whales amd dolphins are all sentient so we shouldn't eat them!

yeah but Republicans taught Sarah Palin to talk, but you cant teach such beasts to understand what theyre saying, or offer original content to a question
NOT SENTIENT

 

[pman]

To be sentient, a creature must be capable of itelectule dialogue, and has an iq >80, one monkey got 104, more inteligent than the average human!

 

[Yasser Arafat]

so mutes arent sentient?

 

[Yasser Arafat]

or retards?

we should be allowed to eat retards?

 

[Kwayera]

To be sentient, a creature must be capable of itelectule dialogue, and has an iq >80, one monkey got 104, more inteligent than the average human!

Incorrect.

 

[pman]

No, they are sentient because the majority of there species has an IQ above 80

 

[Kwayera]

Hmmm i guess i'm suspicious of eating pigs and shellifish - as they are nature's garbage disposals. Shellfish are known to have concentrations of up to 30 times the levels of pollutants in the water - these 'filter feeders' digest food in such a way that contaminants are absorbed into the flesh - they exist to purify the river or stream they inhabit for fish etc.

Mm. No. They are filter-feeders, sure, but I guarantee you the average fish has more "pollutants" than shellfish. Biomagnification, yo.

As for pigs - On examining the swine’s anatomy, we find that, as a supplement to his bad appetite he has but one poorly constructed stomach arrangement, and very limited excretory organs generally. Consequently, in about three hours after he has eaten his polluted swill, putrid carrion, or other offensive matter, man may eat the same in second-hand style off the ribs of the pig.

Mmm no.

Compare this to a cow with 5 stomachs etc you can see that these shit eating failure animals are bad for us - not to mention fattening.

Edit: A lot of the bible stuff seems pretty interesting on this topic: I found this on livestock: The animals that chewed the cud and divided the hoof, such as the ox, sheep, goat, deer, buffalo, etc., because of the saculated condition of the alimentary canal and the secondary cud receptacle, have practically three stomachs, as refining agencies and cleansing laboratories, for the purifying of their food; thus weeding out from their systems most of the poisonous and deleterious matter

It's not for "refining" or "cleansing". They need multiple stomachs to digest hard cellulose, and to get as much nutrition as they can out of extremely nutrition-poor foods (such as grass).

And this on poultry: e clean bird has a stomach or gizzard with a double skin which can be easily separated. . . . Examples are the chicken, the turkey, and certain species of ducks and geese. Knowing these facts about the chicken, we might believe that the Creator permitted it to be used for food because it has a digestive system something like that of the clean beasts-a digestive system more capable of eliminating impurities from the food eaten than is the digestive system of the unclean animals.

It seems perhaps its not right because its in the bible - maybe some of the stuff is in the bible because its right?

You don't know jack about biology or anatomy, do you?

No, they are sentient because the majority of there species has an IQ above 80

No.

Sentience does not have an IQ limit, though obviously a high IQ may be correlated.

greenpace is already at this.
hurling rotten shit to mashimaro whaling ship.

and the japanesu retun the favor with Flashbangs lol.

That's Sea Shepherd, not Greenpeace. SS and Greenpeace don't like each other very much.

 

[Iron]

Mm. No. They are filter-feeders, sure, but I guarantee you the average fish has more "pollutants" than shellfish. Biomagnification, yo.

No.

Mmm no.

No.

It's not for "refining" or "cleansing". They need multiple stomachs to digest hard cellulose, and to get as much nutrition as they can out of extremely nutrition-poor foods (such as grass).

This.

You don't

No.

know jack

Incorrect.

about

Wrong.

biology or anatomy

.

, do you?

Not at all,