You all say that faith in a god exists is proof enough (for the individual concerned)...THen faith that a god exists is also...proof enough...
You cannot prove or disprove the existance of a god. But as I have been saying, you can prove that a god does not need to exist.
And to reply to Mr Eazy, um i follow buddhists more philosohphical status than practice the actual religion. Even though im a braught upbuddhist, i want to really examine the truth about it inorder to follow it.
However, like Soha said with Islam, I think personally from my viewpoint that Buddhism gives me the right knowledge to understand many thruths about this world, and gives a great social value system on how to look upon life.
It is, I beleive, one of the main religions, that has not killed inorder for religious conquest or supremecy. I have not as thus heard about any mass killings in the name of this religion.
And without attacking anyone (i truely donot want to offend, but this question has been truely bugging me), can someone please tel me why, especially in the name of islam, terrorists have killed people...There reasoning is that they have been visited by god and are carrying out gods true intention. So if they say that this is a result of divine intervention, and people on this thread speak about god instructing them to do perform certain things, (divine intervention), then arent both equally justified (i dont mean that killing should ever be justified for any means, just speaking in context of this thread) in the name of god? And how can someone say that "god could not of possibly instructed those hideous things", when they can't read that subjects mind, and vice versa...And therefore in essence isn't every action partaken b such religious disciples (whether fundemantalists or not), justifed according to God's "holy" word?