dry cell (1 Viewer)

zinc

Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2006
Messages
58
Gender
Female
HSC
2008
is the cathode the graphite core or the graphite, the manganese dioxide and the ammonium chloride or is the ammonium chloride the electrolyte? Very confused.
Thanks
 

SkimDawg

Feeling Good
Joined
Nov 23, 2007
Messages
200
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
anode: Zn ----> Zn(2+) +2e
cathode: NH4(+) + MnO2 + H2O + e ---> Mn(OH)3 + NH3
the carbon graphite rod is the cathode. the zinc casing is the anode. the C, MnO2 and NH4Cl im pretty sure is the electrolyte (the paste is like a mixture of the 3)
 

danz90

Active Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2007
Messages
1,467
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
SkimDawg said:
anode: Zn ----> Zn(2+) +2e
cathode: NH4(+) + MnO2 + H2O + e ---> Mn(OH)3 + NH3
the carbon graphite rod is the cathode. the zinc casing is the anode. the C, MnO2 and NH4Cl im pretty sure is the electrolyte (the paste is like a mixture of the 3)
the electrolyte past is made up of NH4Cl / ZnCl2 . MnO2 is the oxidant, and skimdawg rightly said that C(s) is the cathode.

Those equations for oxidation and reduction are also correct ;)
 

totallybord

Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2006
Messages
209
Gender
Female
HSC
2008
for the reduction half eqn, i got another eqn from another textbook
2MnO +2NH4+ + 2e ->Mn2O3 +H2O + 2NH3
?
is that still ok?
 

danz90

Active Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2007
Messages
1,467
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
totallybord said:
for the reduction half eqn, i got another eqn from another textbook
2MnO +2NH4+ + 2e ->Mn2O3 +H2O + 2NH3
?
is that still ok?
from knowledge, the oxidant is MnO2, not MnO.
So then, you use:

Oxidation: MnO2(s) + NH4+(aq) + H2O(l) + e- ---> Mn(OH)3(s) + NH3(aq)
 

totallybord

Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2006
Messages
209
Gender
Female
HSC
2008
yeah sorry its 2MnO2 and the rest of the eqn
is that wrong still ?
 

danz90

Active Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2007
Messages
1,467
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
totallybord said:
yeah sorry its 2MnO2 and the rest of the eqn
is that wrong still ?
hmm, there shouldn't be a 2 in front of all the species.
its a 1:1:1:1 stoichiometric ratio.
 

Azreil

Member
Joined
May 28, 2007
Messages
274
Gender
Female
HSC
2008
Maybe it was put like that to balance out the e on both sides and hence determine the final equation?
 

danz90

Active Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2007
Messages
1,467
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
Azreil said:
Maybe it was put like that to balance out the e on both sides and hence determine the final equation?
yeah, good point.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top