eco assessment =( helpp plzz on external stability (1 Viewer)

viol8ta

cr8tor
Joined
Feb 13, 2005
Messages
5
Location
parra
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
part of my assessment is to * describe the current issues to do with aus external stability * evaluate current governemnt policies to improve aus external stability * describe reasons for aus eco growth over the 2000 - 2004 period listing the gdp per year
* give statistics for net foreign liabilities and net foreign debt as % of GDP...

can some one please tell me some good points i can write about or any good sites where i can get good information from plzzz..... thank you very much
 

Demandred

Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2004
Messages
849
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
Off the top of my head...

Why growing so well?:

- We're riding on a commodities boom (commodities = minerals). This is mostly attributed to the growth of China, we supply heaps of their steel and other raw materials to fuel their high growth.

- Microeconomic policies. Heaps of deregulation by the Labor government in the 1980s, made markets more flexible to change and increased market forces and competitiveness. Banks, finance, labour, telecommuncations etc..

- Low inflation, the RBA's main goal is to reduce inflation no matter what, even at the cost of recession. The 1980s were a painful lesson, they found out that growth can be achieved a lot quicker with inflation curbed. This is owed to the RBA's pre-emptive monetary policy - increase interest rate to reduce 6-18 months before it is projected.


Current issues off the top of my head:

- Drought, Australia's high dependance on agriculture, if you have a look at Australia's economic history, everytime there is a recession, Australia is much worse off because of agriculture. Agriculture is oversupplied in the world market -a good harvest is a bad year for farmers.

- Australia's inability to develop a proper competitive manufacturing sector - most of the 'manufacturing' we do are hardly manufacturing at all, e.g. turning raw iron to processed iron. Our MFG is nothing compared to the rest of the world. We don't produce our computers, machinery, so we import them.

- Recent world recession, Australia was a great place to invest after 9/11. Our interest rates were relatively very high (means also high returns) at 4-5% when most economies had low interest rates to boost economic growth, US had like .5% (you'll get this when doing government policies later on). High investment = high net outflows.

- High exchange rates, high rates = cheaper imports, expensive exports. We hovering around mid 70s US cents, if we were to drop to 50 US cents as we did a few years back, we may have gotten higher exports as they are like about 30% cheaper for overseas buyers. Than again our imports would drop too, since we import most high tech goods, our real income are reduced as imports become more expensive, thus reducing the standard of living. We would also be stuffed because of a sudden our repayments on investment would increase heaps.

The world recession is pretty much a double edged sword.


Get the figures from RBA's site. http://www.rba.gov.au/Statistics/

Edit - I take no liability if this is wrong and earns you 0/20.
 

viol8ta

cr8tor
Joined
Feb 13, 2005
Messages
5
Location
parra
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
hey, thanks very much, that information ws very useful. i cant seeem to find the exact rates for economic growth in australia from 2000 to 2004, nor net foreign liabilities for yr 2003 - 2004..

Can anyone pleasee tell me the current governemnt policies which government uses to improve australia external stability...

once again thank you very much for the help
 

Demandred

Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2004
Messages
849
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
General essay I just founding whilst digging through stuff. lol it was a different world back then. Basically copied bits and pieces from the text book and shoved them together

This essay suppose to help you, I take no responsibility if you get caught plagurising.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The current account shows the money flows from all exports & imports of goods, services, income and current transfers for a period of one year, these transfers are no reversible however. Australia’s CAD comprises of two major areas, both of which saw double digit negatives in recent years, the goods and services account and the capital and financial account. In the recent years, Australia has experienced high levels of current account deficit (CAD), amongst the highest of the OCED countries. This means Australia has more money flowing out than coming in, there are a number of causes of this and can result into a potential problem for the economy, as well as making it more volatile. This has prompted government to implement both macroeconomic and microeconomic policies to deal with the problem, which has shown some promising results.

Firstly, the goods and services account is the net goods and the net income account. The net goods deal with the balance of exports and imports whilst net income deals with the earnings on investment. The net goods area has blown to – 18.2 million, meaning that we import a lot more than we export. This has been due to the recent drought which saw billions of agriculture exports lost. Our export base is also quite narrow and is subjected to high levels of competitiveness in the international market; this is heavily relied on the world business cycle. The short-term cyclical factors saw most of the world’s leading economies drop into recession, meaning that countries are less eager to buy our exports thereby helping our CAD.

Australia also don’t have a broad production base, meaning that Australia cannot provide goods and services which are demanded by the consumers, prompting them to import them instead. Globalisation has resulted in the reduction of many trade barriers, as more goods are available at a lower price, consumers are prompted to spend more on imports. Australia has also experienced high levels of economic growth whilst the world plunged into an economic downturn, resulting in high amounts of spending on imports as prices drop around the world. The rising of prices of fuel has also been a main culprit. The net goods and services account stands at -19.7 billion with 18.2 billion from net goods, services however is at -1.5 billion

Perhaps the biggest part of our CAD is the net income sector, it covers the payments on borrowings and returns on foreign investment, and it reflects Australia’s foreign liabilities which are derived from the capital and financial account. It is at 22.6 billion or 5.7% of GDP. As more capital and financial inflows comes into Australia, more and more Australia assets would be owned by foreigners, our foreign liability current stands at 359 billion or nearly 60% of GDP.

The main factors contributing to our high levels of negative net income is interest and exchange rates. Since almost 60% of our foreign liabilities are in form of foreign currencies, a decrease or increase in our exchange, an increase or decrease in our exchange rates would see a lowering of our CAD, however our exports would suffer and consumers would import more. Australia’s relatively high interest rates have made Australia very attractive due to higher returns during the world recession since 9/11. Other factors include our national savings; Australians have one of the lowest in the OCED countries, resulting in many institutions relying on foreign savings to finance their projects.

In the long term, the growth of Australia’s foreign debt can lead to debt sustainability which means that it becomes increasingly difficult to service the debt. Debt rises faster than the increase in GDP, than the interest repayments take up an increasing proportion of Australia’s GDP, reducing both overall standard of living and economic growth, however this has not happened to the lowering of global interest rates in the 1990s. A high level of foreign liability can result in a vicious debt a high CAD requires more capital and financial inflows to repay it back (because BOP = O). This would lead to a higher CAD as net income has increased, this would continuously repeat itself, and this presents a big problem. A high level of foreign liabilities may also reduce Australia’s credit rating which reflects the confidence in the potential of an economy, thus increasing the volatility of the economy, should confidence drop and all investors pull funds out, it may cause an economic disaster.

The threat posed to the Australian economy by high levels of CAD has seen the Australian government take up both macroeconomic policies and structural microeconomic policies. It has focused to attend to 3 main areas, the increase Australia’s international competitiveness, increase national savings and diversifying Australia’s export base as well as many other policies. The government can do very little to address the issue of our net income, as it is mostly conducted through the private sector.

The use tightening monetary and fiscal policy, in the late 80’s it was introduced to reduce consumption and investment, reducing CAD and lowering inflation. The implementation of micro-economic reform policies aimed at lifting efficiency and international competitiveness of domestic firms. The aim of the Howard government in maintaining fiscal balance over the medium and long term to ensure savings would not be drained by public usage through surpluses, thus lowering CAD.

Australia’s export base is heavily weighted towards primary industry commodities, around 60% of Australia’s products are from agriculture and minerals, very unusual and dangerous for an AIE. During the long term, in the wake of globalisation and technology, the prices for these products would fall as demand shifts to more sophisticated goods, as well as that, the prices and levels of demand for primary industry fluctuate year to year. Australia is trying to change this by promoting and lending assistance to infant manufacturing industries. Current progress shows that Australia had some success; however overall, sophisticated manufacturing remains a small area of Australian exports. This would not only boost exports, but also reduce imports.

In the increase of Australia’s international competitiveness would also help our exports, this would be mostly done by reducing input costs through many microeconomic and structural reforms. Firstly, pegging wages to productivity, it has ensured no radical pay rises, thus keeping the cost of labour factor of production under control. It has also introduced many policies to reduce inflation, which successfully saw inflation drop to the 2-3% range, this done through the RBA’s pre-emptive monetary policies, by taking actions before inflation occurs. The more efficient allocation of resources prompted by globalisation has also seen a higher level of productivity, the policies introduced during the late 1970s and early 1980s has changed work practices and production methods and reduced input costs has been widely successful at increasing our export competitiveness.

Although Australia has recently seen high levels of CAD, most of the problems are being in fixed by microeconomic policies, whilst some cannot be fixed. In terms of goods and services, the drought and globalisation has seen Australia be less competitive, prompting the government to implement microeconomic policies to increase competitiveness and export base to boost exports. The current account however is a more complex problem to fix as it mostly accumulated from the private sector. Though it represents a problem, some might say that the inflows are necessary to develop our economy. In the end, though our CAD still remains a problem, many structural reforms are already underway to fix these problems, some have been quite successful.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Last edited:

Conspirocy

Member
Joined
May 3, 2004
Messages
608
Location
Maroubra
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
lol your question kinda sounds like last years hsc question, i did that one loved it, actually let me look it up

"Analyse the causes of Australia’s on-going current account deficit and its effects on external"

see as im going to say a bit down, external stability is not just about the CAD

anyways, since it is external stability, i wouldnt just focus on the the CAD!!
beacuse as you know it also includes foreign liabilities and the exchange rate

and i actually talked heaps about the exchange rate because like u can throw in some kewl diagrams lol and u mention terms of trade, and then debt servicing etc etc.

anyways yeah i had a trial question that was similar to the hsc one and i kinda just re wrote that and added the exchange rates part and kinda skipped a bit of the policy options

anyways here is my trial question and answer

Question: Discuss the determinants of Australia’s Current Account Deficit and the effectiveness of macroeconomic and microeconomic policy responses to the problem.


The Current Account is the sum of the Balance of Goods and Services in Australia; plus Net Incomes; and Net Current Transfers. Recently, the CAD has undergone a transformation from upswing of debt to downswing of debt – much like a type of business cycle – however it is apparent that it is now at a stage where it can be controlled. This is due to both macroeconomic policy and microeconomic policy. Macroeconomics is seen as a blunt policy tool that is aimed at curving out fluctuations in the business cycle (refer to figure 1)

Figure one: Business cycle

It aims to curve out a fluctuation, which is an upswing that is too high, or a downswing that is too low. It is implemented through both monetary and fiscal policy.

The second policy option available to restrain the Current Account Deficit is microeconomic reform. This is seen as sharper tool of economic policy that aims at changing the supply side of a single industry by promoting allocative, technical, and dynamic efficiency.

The Current Account Deficit in today’s Australian context can be broken up into two segments. The Structural component – which is something that cannon be influenced overnight, and the Cyclical component which can be influenced in the short term.

The Structural component of the Current Account deficit is in essence the Net Income component, that is realistically the level of income credits minus debit. This component has remained at a fixed place – adjusted for inflation as you can see by comparing the Trend estimates from 2003 (December) at -5,804 million dollars, to the March 2004 estimate of -5,809 million dollars. This is basically unchanged and the statistics represent this with no actual % change. However seasonally adjusted figures indicate there was a slight 4% change in the positive direction for Australia.

Looking at the Cyclical components is where most microeconomic concepts can come in. the Cyclical part of the CAD refers to the Balance of Goods and Services which changes with the domestic and international economic environment. It basically refers to the amount of goods and services credits minus the amount of goods and services debits. Currently the situation in Australia reflects that the balance of goods and services increased 8% between December 2003 to March 2004, reflecting a widening of the current account deficit by and overall effect of 2% in this period.

The government tries to control the cyclical components through macroeconomic policy.

One such policy is Fiscal Policy, which is the amount of spending by a government to influence the business cycle.

Over the past six budgets the Howard Governments aim has been to reduce the current account deficit. This have been achieved by creating consecutive budget surpluses and then using part of these surpluses to pay off the CAD. This is a contractionary policy that has been quite effective in combating the problem of the CAD inherited from the previous government.

However, this is only one influence of the cyclical component. A more effective way to influence the cyclical component is through using monetary policy tools. That is Domestic Market Operations and the cash rate.

As stated earlier, it can be seen that BOGS is causing a blow-out of the CAD – this means that Australia currently must be experiencing a good rate of economic growth (Around 4.1% current estimates). Therefore consumers and firms in the economy are spending more – and a lot of this spending is going overseas. To combat this problem the RBA may decide to implement a contractionary monetary policy.

This involves the selling of Government Securities, that causes a reduction in the money supply. Thus detracting from the incentive of businesses and consumers to spend because the price of money (interest rate) is more expensive and so is spending. This would see a decline in the debits of the BOGS. However, this would also slow down economic growth. The RBA does at present have a contractionary monetary policy but this is not aimed at addressing the problem of the CAD.

In fact, at present the macroeconomic policy may not be addressing the problem of the CAD because it is not seen as a problem or a priority to policy makers. This is justified by the Pitchford Thesis – basically the Foreign Debt in the CAD is not a problem because it is private rather than public debt.

Instead, it seems, that a long term solution to the CAD is the best approach. Therefore throughout the 1980s and 1990s the Australian government has initiated several reforms aimed at improving the CAD.

The main problem to overcome that would assist the CA is the structure of the export base. Currently Australia has a very narrow export base – mainly agricultural and mining industry’s (these account for 60% of Australia’s exports). This is a problem because of the fluctuations of commodity prices on global markets. A reduction in these prices causes a decrease in export revenue and therefore the BOGS will continue to blow-out. Additionally the Exchange Rate affects the CAD because a depreciation in the $AUD means we must export more to pay for our imports, as well as the cost of servicing debt increasing.

This is why Australia has begun deregulating many of its industry’s in an effort to promote: overall Allocative Efficiency in the economy (between industries); Technical and Dynamic Efficiency within individual industries.

One method of microeconomic reform to achieve this has been the removal of protection in 2001. The overall level of protection that remains in Australia today is 4%. This has made Australia able to broaden its export base and compete internationally. It is said that these microeconomic reforms have resulted in 0.5% of GDP growth over the last 5 years. Higher GDP allows Australia to pay off the CAD.

For example the Motor Vehicle Industry Microeconomic reform has:
1. Shifted Resources away from this inefficient industry (previously)
2. Made the remaining resources and produces efficient.

However, for microeconomic changes to take place they must be complimented with a macroeconomic policy that creates an environment for these changes to develop. That is generally seen as growth of GDP between 3.5-4.5% and low inflation (between 2-3% on average over the course of the economic cycle). Or internal stability. This will allow the micro reforms to change the export base and reduce the CAD. Macroeconomic policy is doing this.

The problem of the CAD is not really seen as one that should be targeted. In the long term structural change microeconomically is being made – perhaps in twenty years we will see the results. In the short term Macroeconomic policy is creating an environment that increases the CAD but is needed for Microeconomic reform. Only time will tell if Australia can ever reduce the CAD.
 

caps04

New Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2004
Messages
10
great answer above

conspirocy the above was excellent!

I hope you are either doing, or planning to do, a BEc.

Laterz
 

Demandred

Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2004
Messages
849
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
I was naive, so I will add this.

Much of Australia's microeconomic reform has done very little to improve Australia's CAD. In fact it actually has done more harm than good. Australia's embrace of free market ideology has pushed further Australia's desposition towards primary goods, which is a big no-no. Kalecki (famous economist) said that in order to over come the balance of payment constraint, you have to have an efficient sophisticated manufacturing export sector, and this has been proven true. This was proposed by Senator Button in the late 80s, unfortunately, economic rationalists often pointed out the dangers of government intervention. Thus, so we are now, terms of trade are highest ever in 30 years, commodities prices are shooting through the roof, in the end, we're living on borrowed time from China's boom. After this, we're looking down from a very steep cliff.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top